Morphometric Analysis-based Prioritization of Sub-watersheds for Conservation Planning in Purna River Basin, Maharashtra

Authors

  • Gayatri Wani College of Agricultural Engineering and Technology, Vasantrao Naik Marathwade Krushi Vidyapeeth, Parbhani, Maharashtra, India - 431402 Author
  • Pranita Mhaiske College of Agricultural Engineering and Technology, Vasantrao Naik Marathwade Krushi Vidyapeeth, Parbhani, Maharashtra, India - 431402 Author
  • S.A. Chaware ICAR- National Bureau of Soil Survey and Land Use Planning, Nagpur, Maharashtra, India - 440033 Author
  • Ch. Jyotiprava Dash ICAR- National Bureau of Soil Survey and Land Use Planning, Nagpur, Maharashtra, India - 440033 Author
  • Sirisha Adamala ICAR- National Bureau of Soil Survey and Land Use Planning, Nagpur, Maharashtra, India - 440033 Author
  • M.R. More College of Agricultural Engineering and Technology, Vasantrao Naik Marathwade Krushi Vidyapeeth, Parbhani, Maharashtra, India - 431402 Author
  • P. Pakhare ICAR- National Bureau of Soil Survey and Land Use Planning, Nagpur, Maharashtra, India - 440033 Author
  • H.Biswas Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.53550/ijsc.v53.i2.193

Keywords:

Morphometric parameter, Prioritization, Stream power index, Sediment transport index, Topography, Watershed management

Abstract

Watershed studies provide a critical framework for understanding hydrological responses to environmental and developmental activities, enabling effective planning for resource optimization. This study focuses on prioritizing subwatersheds according to their vulnerability to soil erosion, based on morphometric, topographic-hydrological parameters, land use, and land cover in the Purna River basin of the Marathwada region, Maharashtra, India. The Purna basin is of 7th order and contains 22 sub-watersheds (SW). The slope in the study area ranges from 0 to 117%. The mean bifurcation ratio values for various sub-watersheds in the river basin range from 1.96 (SW-22) to 5.98 (SW-13). The drainage density values of sub-watersheds in the Purna river basin vary from 0.78 (SW-13) to 0.92 km/km² (SW-22), reflecting the presence of poor and coarse drainage texture. The channel maintenance constant shows that, on average, 1.20 km² of basin area is required to develop and maintain a 1 km long stream channel. The prioritization indicates that SW-13 (Cp=3.91), SW-5 (Cp=4.10), and SW-16 (Cp=4.79) are high-priority subwatersheds needing structural interventions (check dams, contour bunding) and vegetative measures based on their elevated bifurcation ratios (>4.17), low drainage density (<0.81 km/km²), and intensive agricultural land use (>85%). Since the prioritization relies solely on GIS-based DEM-derived empirical models and land use and land cover analysis, it can serve as an initial framework for resource allocation. These rankings should be viewed as indicative rather than definitive. Consequently, the operational implementation of this prioritization should involve a comprehensive validation process to align model predictions with field conditions and long-term watershed management goals.

References

Adam, T., Fetene, A., and Girma, M. 2024. Morphometric analysis: subwatershed prioritization in the temcha watershed, upper Blue Nile Basin, Ethiopia. Sustainable Water Resources Management, 10:155. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40899-024-01134-y

Adhikary, P.P. and Dash, Ch. J. 2018. Morphometric analysis of Katra watershed of Eastern Ghats: A GIS approach. International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Science, 7(3):1651-1665. DOI: https://doi.org/10.20546/ijcmas.2018.703.198

Aher, V.S., Shinde, M.S., Pathak, S.D. 2014. Morphometric analysis of watershed using GIS: A case study of the Purna river basin, Maharashtra, India. International Journal of Engineering Research and Applications, 4(6):49-54.

Ahirwar, S., Yadav, A. and Sharma, R. 2019. Morphometric analysis of watershed using remote sensing and GIS techniques. Journal of Environmental Management, 245:123-134.

Beven, K. And Kirkby, M. 1979. A physically based, variable contributing area model of basin hydrology. Hydrolological Sciences Journal, 24(1):43-69. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02626667909491834

Chaudhari, V. S., Vikhe, S. D., Shinde, G. U., Awari, H. W., and Ingle, V. K. 2023, Morphometric analysis of Kasura river watershed using RS and GIS techniques. Preprints.org, pp 1-11 (https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202312.1189.v1) DOI: https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202312.1189.v1

Dahiphale, P., Singh, M., and Yousuf, A. 2022. Watershed prioritization based on morphometric analysis in Kandi region of Punjab using geospatial technology. Indian J. Soil Cons 50(1) 1-11 DOI :10.59797/ijsc. v 50.i1.153 DOI: https://doi.org/10.59797/ijsc.v50.i1.153

Fenta, A.A., Yasuda, H, Shimizu, K., Haregeweyn, N. and Woldearegay, K. 2024. Prioritization of sub-watersheds in Tuirial river basin through geo-environment integration and morphometric parameters. Arabian Journal of Geosciences, 17(225): 1-16. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-024-12030-2

Gravelius, H. 1914. Flusskunde. Goschen Verlagshan dlung Berlin. In: Zavoianu I (Ed) Morphometry of drainage basins. Elsevier Amsterdam Horton, R.E. 1932. Drainage basin characteristics. Transactions of the American Geophysical Union, 13(1):350-361.

Horton, R.E. 1945. Erosional development of streams andtheir drainage basins: Hydrophysical approach to quantitative morphology. Geological Society of American Bulletin, 56(3):275–370. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1130/0016-7606(1945)56[275:EDOSAT]2.0.CO;2

Ingle, N.B., 2022, Morphometric analysis of Morna River sub basin using geospatial approach. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Development, 9(1):71-78.

Miller, V.C. 1953. A quantitative geomorphic study of drainage basin characteristics in the Clinch Mountain area, Virginia US Geological Survey, Water-Supply Paper 1536-D.

Rahmati, O., Samadi, M., Shahabi, H., Azareh, A., Rafiei-Sardooi, E., Alilou, H. and Nitheshnirmal, S. 2019. SWPT: an automated GISbased tool for prioritization of sub-watersheds based on morphometric and topo-hydrological factors. Geosciences Frontier, 10(5):1605–1618. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gsf.2019.03.009

Sanchez, E.F. and Alvarez, C.L. 2024. Prioritization of hydrological restoration areas using AHP and GIS in Dulcepambariver basin in Bolivar–Ecuador. Journal of Hydrology, 11(6):76-81. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/hydrology11060081

Schumm, S. 1956. Evolution of drainage systems and slopes in Badland at Peth Amboy, New Jersey. Geological Society of Americal Bulletin, 67:597-646. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1130/0016-7606(1956)67[597:EODSAS]2.0.CO;2

Sekhar, P.R. and Mathew, A. 2022. Morphometric analysis for prioritizing sub-watersheds of Murredu river basin, Telangana State, India, using a geographical information system. Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences, 69 (1):44 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s44147-022-00094-4

Singh, V.G. and Singh, S.K. 2022. Analysis of geo-morphometric and topo-hydrological indices using COP-DEM: a case study of Betwa River Basin, Central India. Geology, Ecology, and Landscapes, 8(2):101-128. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/24749508.2022.2097376

Strahler, A.N. 1964. Quantitative geomorphology of drainage basins and channel networks in: Chow VT (Ed) Handbook of applied hydrology McGraw Hill Book Company, New York, 4–11.

Sujatha, M., Reddy, D.S. and Suresh, P. 2015. Morphometric analysis of watersheds using GIS: A case study of the Chitravati river basin, India. International Journal of Geosciences, 6(1):1-10.

Zade M.R., Soni, G.P. and Gupta K.K. 2022. Vertical accuracy assessment of CartoDEM, SRTM and ALOS DEMs using GTS and DGPS measurement in Narmada Basin (Madhya Pradesh, India). Journal of Geomatics, 16(1): 66-80.

Downloads

Published

2025-11-21

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Morphometric Analysis-based Prioritization of Sub-watersheds for Conservation Planning in Purna River Basin, Maharashtra. (2025). Indian Journal of Soil Conservation, 53(2), 89-102. https://doi.org/10.53550/ijsc.v53.i2.193

Similar Articles

21-30 of 295

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.

Most read articles by the same author(s)