Mapping Hill and Mountain Ecosystem in India: A Review and Framework for Ecological Production Units (EPUs)

Authors

  • Rajive K. Singh Formerly, ICAR- Indian Institute of Soil and Water Conservation, RC, Kota Author
  • Raman Jeet Singh ICAR- Indian Institute of Soil and Water Conservation, Dehradun 248195 Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.53550/ijsc.v53.i3.203

Keywords:

Ecological production units, Hill ecosystems, Land mapping, Spatial classification, Watershed planning

Abstract

Mountain and hill ecosystems (the Himalaya-Northwest hills and Northeast hills, Aravalli, Western Ghats, and Eastern Ghats) in India provide critical ecosystem services, including biodiversity conservation, water regulation, and livelihood support, yet their spatial heterogeneity is poorly captured by existing classification frameworks. This paper presents a narrative synthesis of global and Indian approaches to mapping mountain ecosystems and evaluates their suitability for land-use planning in complex upland regions. We review major frameworks, including biogeographic zones, agroecological regions, watershed divisions, WWF ecoregions, and global mountain classifications, highlighting their strengths and limitations in representing ecological and production variability. A key gap identified is the absence of an integrated, operational unit that combines ecological, climatic, and socio-economic dimensions for planning purposes. To address this, we propose a conceptual multi-criteria GIS-based framework for delineating Ecological Production Units (EPUs) in Indian hill regions. The framework integrates topography, climate, soils, land cover, and human factors to define homogeneous units of ecological productivity and management relevance. The study demonstrates that EPUs can serve as a bridge between ecological classification and decision-making, with applications in watershed management, agroforestry, conservation planning, and climate adaptation. However, implementation is constrained by data gaps, scale mismatches, and institutional fragmentation. The paper contributes a structured synthesis of classification systems and provides a conceptual pathway toward operationalizing spatially explicit, ecosystem-based planning in India's hill and mountain regions.

References

Central Water Commission. (2012). Watershed atlas of India. Government of India.

Central Water Commission. (2014). River basin atlas of India. Government of India.

Choudhury, A. U. (2001). The mammals of north-east India. Gibbon Books.

Dinerstein, E., Olson, D., Joshi, A., Vynne, C., Burgess, N. D., Wikramanayake, E., & Saleem, M. (2017). An ecoregion-based approach to protecting half the terrestrial realm. BioScience, 67(6), 534–545. https://doi.org/10.1093/biosci/bix014 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/biosci/bix014

Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. (2007). Land evaluation: Towards a revised framework. FAO Land and Water Bulletin.

Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. (2018). Mountain green cover index: Metadata. FAO.

Forman, R. T. T., & Godron, M. (1986). Landscape ecology. Wiley. Gadgil, M., & Guha, R. (1992). This fissured land: An ecological history of India. Oxford University Press.

India-WRIS. (2015). India water resources information system: Metadata and basin classification. Ministry of Jal Shakti.

Kapos, V., Rhind, J., Edwards, M., Price, M. F., & Ravilious, C. (2000). Developing a map of the world's mountain forests. In M. F. Price & N. Butt (Eds.), Forests in sustainable mountain development: A state-of-knowledge report for 2000 (pp. 4–9). Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1079/9780851994468.0004

Körner, C., Jetz, W., Paulsen, J., Payne, D., Rudmann-Maurer, K., & Spehn, E. M. (2017). A global inventory of mountains for biogeographical applications. Alpine Botany, 127(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00035-016-0182-6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00035-016-0182-6

Körner, C., & Spehn, E. M. (Eds.). (2002). Mountain biodiversity: A global assessment. Parthenon Publishing.

Myers, N., Mittermeier, R. A., Mittermeier, C. G., da Fonseca, G. A., & Kent, J. (2000). Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities. Nature, 403, 853–858. https://doi.org/10.1038/35002501 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/35002501

National Bureau of Soil Survey and Land Use Planning. (1999). Agroecological regions of India (NBSS Publication No. 35). Indian Council of Agricultural Research.

Negi, G. C. S., & Joshi, V. (2002). Oak decline in the central Himalaya: Causes and consequences. Environmental Conservation, 29(3), 1–9.

Olson, D. M., & Dinerstein, E. (2002). The global 200: Priority ecoregions for global conservation. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden, 89(2), 199–224. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/3298564

Olson, D. M., Dinerstein, E., Wikramanayake, E. D., Burgess, N. D., Powell, G. V. N., Underwood, E. C., & Kassem, K. R. (2001). Terrestrial ecoregions of the world: A new map of life on Earth. BioScience, 51(11), 933–938. https://doi.org/10.1641/0006-3568(2001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1641/0006-3568(2001)051[0933:TEOTWA]2.0.CO;2

Pascal, J.-P. (1988). Wet evergreen forests of the Western Ghats of India. Institut Français de Pondichéry.

Planning Commission, Government of India. (1989). Agro-climatic regional planning: Further refinement. Planning Commission. Ravindranath, N. H., & Sukumar, R. (1996). Impact of climate change on forests in India. Current Science, 70(3), 113–122.

Rodgers, W. A., & Panwar, H. S. (1988). Biogeographical classification of India. Wildlife Institute of India.

Rodgers, W. A., Panwar, H. S., & Mathur, V. B. (2002). Wildlife protected area network in India: A review. Wildlife Institute of India.

Sehgal, J. (1995). Agro-ecological regions of India. NBSS&LUP, ICAR.

Singh, J. S., Rawat, Y. S., & Chaturvedi, O. P. (2011). Himalayan forest ecosystems: Services, threats, and management. Environmental Management, 48(2), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-011-9684-5

Snethlage, M. A., Schmitt, M., Bartsch, A., et al. (2022). A hierarchical inventory of the world's mountains for global comparative mountain science. Scientific Data, 9, 149. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-022-01256-y DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-022-01256-y

Tiwari, B. K., Barik, S. K., & Tripathi, R. S. (2010). Indigenous land-use systems and biodiversity conservation in North-East India. Biodiversity and Conservation, 19, 343–362.

Tripathi, O. P., & Barik, S. K. (2003). Shifting cultivation in north-east India: Indigenous practices and knowledge systems. Agroforestry Systems, 59, 1–14.

Turner, M. G., Gardner, R. H., & O'Neill, R. V. (2001). Landscape ecology in theory and practice: Pattern and process. Springer.

United Nations Environment Programme–World Conservation Monitoring Centre. (2002). Mountain watch: Environmenta change and sustainable development in mountains. UNEPWCMC. Velayutham, M., Mandal, D. K., Mandal, C., & Sehgal, J. (1999).

Agroecologicalsubregions of India for planning and development. NBSS&LUP Bulletin, 35, 1–372.

Xu, J., Grumbine, R. E., Shrestha, A., et al. (2009). The melting Himalayas: Cascading effects of climate change on water, biodiversity, and livelihoods. Conservation Biology, 23(3), 520–530. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2009.01237.x

Downloads

Published

2026-04-21

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Mapping Hill and Mountain Ecosystem in India: A Review and Framework for Ecological Production Units (EPUs). (2026). Indian Journal of Soil Conservation, 53(3), 195-203. https://doi.org/10.53550/ijsc.v53.i3.203

Similar Articles

1-10 of 298

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.