Impact of Land Use Interventions on Soil Organic Carbon Stocks: A Case Study from Antisar Watershed, Western India

Authors

  • Dinesh Dhakshanamurthy ICAR-Indian Institute of Soil and Water Conservation, Research Centre, Anand, Gujarat. Author
  • Gaurav Singh ICAR-Indian Institute of Soil and Water Conservation, Research Centre, Anand, Gujarat. Author
  • Dinesh Jinger ICAR-Indian Institute of Soil and Water Conservation, Research Centre, Anand, Gujarat. Author
  • Gopal Kumar International Water Management Institute, New Delhi.. Author
  • Nandhakumar Natarajan ICAR-Indian Institute of Soil and Water Conservation, Research Centre, Anand, Gujarat. Author
  • Ashok Kumar Singh ICAR-Indian Institute of Soil and Water Conservation, Research Centre, Anand, Gujarat. Author
  • Malharimartand Jagannivas Kaledhonkar ICAR-Indian Institute of Soil and Water Conservation, Research Centre, Anand, Gujarat. Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.53550/ijsc.v53.i1.184

Keywords:

Carbon stock, Eutrophication, Land use, Nitrogen stock, Watershed management

Abstract

A study conducted during 2021–2022 at the Antisar watershed in Kapadvanj Taluka, Kheda District, Gujarat, evaluated soil organic carbon (SOC) and nitrogen (N) stocks across four land use systems: silvi-pasture (SLS), grazing (GLS), agriculture (ALS), and fallow (FLS). Forty soil samples were collected at three depths (0–10, 10–20, and 20–30) cm from treated (Antisar) and control (Malkahana) watersheds. Results revealed significant variations (p < 0.05) in soil pH, SOC, and total N across land uses, with ALS showing the highest pH, SOC, and N content, followed by SLS and FLS. SOC and N declined with depth across all systems. Compared to the control, SOC stocks in Antisar increased across all land uses (21–119) %, highest in fallow lands due to field bunding and leveling. Similarly, total soil carbon stock (TSCS) increased by (-2–315) %, with the highest gain in fallow lands and the lowest in SLS due to inadequate grazing control. The deterioration index indicated net losses of SOC and N with conversion from natural to managed systems, especially in continuously cultivated areas. These findings highlight the vulnerability of agricultural soils to degradation and stress the need for climate-smart, adaptive land use and management practices to enhance carbon sequestration and improve soil health in western India.

References

Abera, G. and Wolde-Meskel, E., 2013. Soil properties, and soil organic carbon stocks of tropical andosol under different land uses. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4236/ojss.2013.33018

Adejuwon, J.O. and Ekanade, O., 1988. A comparison of soil properties under different landuse types in a part of the Nigerian cocoa belt. Catena, 15(3-4), pp.319-331. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0341-8162(88)90054-9

Assessment, M. E. (2005). Ecosystems and Human Well-Being: Future Scenarios Vol. 2.

Bagdi, G.L. and Kurothe, R.S., 2013. Participatory Watershed Development: A Case Study of Antisar Watershed in Gujarat State. Indian Journal of Extension Education, 49(3and4), pp.34-39.

Blake, G.R., 1986. Bulk density. Methods of Soil Analysis. Part, 1. Physical and mineralogical properties. 2nd ed. Wisconsin: American Society of Agronomy; p. 363–82.

Bremner, J.M. and Mulvaney, C.S., 1982. Nitrogen - total. Methods of soil analysis: part 2 chemical and microbiological properties, 9, pp.595-624. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2134/agronmonogr9.2.2ed.c31

Campbell, C.R. and Plank, C.O., 1998. Preparation of plant tissue for laboratory analysis. Methods for Plant Analysis, 37, pp.37-49.

Dawson, J.J. and Smith, P., 2007. Carbon losses from soil and its consequences for land-use management. Science of the total environment, 382(2-3), pp.165-190. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2007.03.023

Ehrenbergerova, L., Cienciala, E., Kučera, A., Guy, L. and Habrová, H., 2016. Carbon stock in agroforestry coffee plantations with different shade trees in Villa Rica, Peru. Agroforestry systems, 90, pp.433-445. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-015-9865-z

Guo, L.B. and Gifford, R.M., 2002. Soil carbon stocks and land use change: a meta analysis. Global change biology, 8(4), pp.345-360. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1354-1013.2002.00486.x

Iqbala, S. and Tiwari, S.C., 2015. Altitudinal variation of soil organic carbon stock in Achanakmar. Int J Curr Res, 7(05), pp.15885-90.

Jobbágy, E.G. and Jackson, R.B., 2000. The vertical distribution of soil organic carbon and its relation to climate and vegetation. Ecological applications, 10(2), pp.423-436. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1890/1051-0761(2000)010[0423:TVDOSO]2.0.CO;2

Lal, R., 2003. Soil erosion and the global carbon budget. Environment international, 29(4), pp.437-450. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0160-4120(02)00192-7

Landon, J.R., 2014. Booker tropical soil manual: a handbook for soil survey and agricultural land evaluation in the tropics and subtropics. Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315846842

Melero, S., López-Bellido, R. J., López-Bellido, L., Muñoz-Romero, V., Moreno, F., & Murillo, J. M. (2011). Long-term effect of tillage, rotation and nitrogen fertiliser on soil quality in a Mediterranean Vertisol. Soil and tillage research, 114(2), 97-107. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2011.04.007

Mchunu, C. and Chaplot, V., 2012. Land degradation impact on soil carbon losses through water erosion and CO2 emissions. Geoderma, 177,pp.72-79. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2012.01.038

McLean, E.O., 1982. Soil pH and lime requirement. In: Page AL, et al., editors. Methods of soil analysis. Part 2: chemical and microbiological properties. 2nd ed. Wisconsin: Soil Science Society of America Inc.; p. 199-224. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2134/agronmonogr9.2.2ed.c12

Post, W.M., Emanuel, W.R., Zinke, P.J. and Stangenberger, A.G., 1982. Soil carbon pools and world life zones. Nature, 298(5870), pp.156-159. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/298156a0

Riedo, M., Gyalistras, D. and Fuhrer, J., 2000. Net primary production and carbon stocks in differently managed grasslands: simulation of sitespecific sensitivity to an increase in atmospheric CO2 and to climate change. Ecological Modelling, 134(2-3), pp.207-227. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3800(00)00356-2

Santantonio, D., Hermann, R.K. and Overton, W.S., 1977. Root biomass studies in forest ecosystems. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0031-4056(23)00138-5

Selassie, Y.G. and Ayanna, G., 2013. Effects of different land use systems on selected physico-chemical properties of soils in Northwestern Ethiopia. Journal of agricultural science, 5(4), p.112. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5539/jas.v5n4p112

Steen, M., 2000. Greenhouse gas emissions from fossil fuel fired power generation systems (pp. 1-61). Ispra, VA, Italy: Institute for Advanced Materials, Joint Research Centre, European Commission.

Tadesse, T., Haque, I. and Aduayi, E.A., 1991. Soil, plant, water, fertilizer, animal manure and compost analysis manual.

Van Reeuwijk, L.P., 2002. Procedures for soil analysis. Technical paper 9, 6th edition. International Soil Reference and Research Center. Walkley, A. and Black, I.A., 1934. An examination of the Degtjareff method for determining soil organic matter, and a proposed modification of the chromic acid titration method. Soil science, 37(1), pp.29-38. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/00010694-193401000-00003

Zhang, Y., Zhao, Y.C., Shi, X.Z., Lu, X.X., Yu, D.S., Wang, H.J., Sun, W.X. and Darilek, J.L., 2008. Variation of soil organic carbon estimates in mountain regions: a case study from Southwest China. Geoderma,146(3-4), pp.449-456. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2008.06.015

Downloads

Published

2025-06-09

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Impact of Land Use Interventions on Soil Organic Carbon Stocks: A Case Study from Antisar Watershed, Western India. (2025). Indian Journal of Soil Conservation, 53(1), 17-23. https://doi.org/10.53550/ijsc.v53.i1.184

Similar Articles

1-10 of 330

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >>