Characterization of groundwater quality for irrigation and drinking purposes using a modified groundwater quality index
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.53550/Keywords:
Delhi, FAO standards, GIS, Groundwater quality index, Sensitivity analysis, WHO standardsAbstract
Groundwater quality assessment is an important issue to a megacity like Delhi, where intensive agriculture, use of sewage and polluted drain water for irrigation and industrial effluents have posed a serious threat to groundwater quality. Describing overall groundwater quality over space is difficult because of multiple contaminants and its wide range of spatial variation. The present study is aimed at determination of the overall groundwater quality using a groundwater quality index after its modification and to map their spatial variation in terms of suitability for irrigation and drinking purposes. For irrigation water quality, five parameters such as electrical conductivity, sodium adsorption ratio, bicarbonate, chloride and magnesium/calcium ratio based on FAO standard and for drinking water quality, eight parameters such as sodium, calcium, magnesium, nitrate, sulphate, fluoride, total dissolved solids and hardness based onWHOstandard were used. The spatial variation of groundwater quality index indicates that overall quality of Delhi groundwater is acceptable for irrigation and drinking, while highly polluted groundwater zones are mainly found at the western part.Approximately, 76.44 and 89.14% area of Delhi have groundwater suitable for irrigation and drinking purposes, respectively. Sensitivity analysis indicates that parameters, which reflect relatively poor water quality (high mean rank value) and those of significant spatial variability imply larger impacts on the index needs to be accurately assessed. The index is very robust to predict drinking water quality.
References
Adhikary, P.P. and Biswas, H. 2011. Geospatial assessment of groundwater quality in Datia district of Bundelkhand. Ind. J. Soil Cons., 39(2): 108-116.
Adhikary, P.P., Chandrasekharan, H., Chakraborty, D. and Kamble, K. 2010. Assessment of groundwater pollution in west Delhi, India using geostatistical approach. Environ. Monit. Assess 167: 599-615.
Adhikary, P.P., Chandrasekharan, H., Dash, J. and Jakhar, P. 2014 Integrated isotopic and hydrochemical approach to identify and evaluate the source and extent of ground water pollution in west Delhi, India. Ind. J. Soil Cons., 42(1): 17-28.
APHA. 1995. Standard methods for the examination of water and Wastewater, 19th edn.APHA,Washington DC, USASS.
Babiker, I.S., Mohamed, M.A.A. and Hiyama, T. 2007. Assessing Water Resour. Manage groundwater quality usingGIS. Water Resour.Manage ., 21: 699 715.
CGWB. 2006. Ground water year book, National Capital Territory, Delhi. Central Ground Water Board, Ministry of Water Resources, Government of India, New Delhi, India.
Chesn in, L. and Yien, C.H. 1950. Turbidimetric determination of available sulphates. In: Proc. Soil Science Society Agriculture, 14: 49-151.
Crosby, N.T., Dennis, A.L. and Stevens, J.G. 1968. An evaluation of some methods for the determination of fluoride in potable waters and other aqueous solutions. Analyst, 93: 643-652.
Datta, P.S., Bhattacharya, S.K. and Tyagi, S.K. 1996. 18O studies on recharge of phreatic aquifers and groundwater flow paths of mixing in the Delhi area. J. Hydrol., 176: 25 36.
Datta, P.S., Deb, D.L. and Tyagi, S.K. 1997. Assessment of groundwater contamination from fertilizers in the Delhi area based on O,NO and K composition. J. Contamin. Hydrol., 27: 249 262.
Duraiswami, R.A., Dumale,V. and Shetty,U. 2009. Geospatial mapping of potential recharge zones in parts of Pune city. J. Geol. Soc. Ind, 73: 621-638.
ESRI. 2004. Using Arc GIS geostatistical analyst. Environmental Systems Research Institute, Redlands, California,NewYork, USA, 300 p.
FAO. 2003. The irrigation challenge: Increasing irrigation contribution to food security through higher water productivity from canal irrigation systems . IPTRID Issue Paper 4, IPTRID Secretariat, Food and agricultural Organization of the United Nations, Rome.
Fetter,C.W. 1999. Contaminant hydrogeology. USA: Prentice Hall, 500 p.
Gamma Design Software,LLC1988. GS+. Michigan, USA.
Gupta, M. and Srivastava, P.K. 2010. Integrating GIS and remote sensing for identification of groundwater potential zones in the hilly terrain of Pavagarh, Gujarat, India. Water Int., 35(2): 233-245.
Hesse, P.R. 1971. A text book of soil chemical analysis. John Murray Publishers Ltd., 50 Albemarle Street, London,WIX4BD.
Kumar, M., Ramanathan, A.L., Rao, M.S. and Kumar, B. 2006. Identification and evaluation of hydrogeochemical processes in the groundwater environment of Delhi, India. Environ. Geo., 50: 1025 1039.
Lodwick, W.A., Monson, W. and Svoboda, L. 1990. Attribute error and sensitivity analysis of map operations in geographical information systems: Suitability analysis. Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Syst, 4(4): 413 428.
Osborn, G.H. and Johns, H. 1951. The rapid determination of sodium and potassium in rocks and minerals by flame photometry. 76: Analyst, 410 415.
Oyarzun, R., Arum, J., Salgado, L. and Marin˜o, M. 2007. Sensitivity analysis and field testing of the RISK-N model in the Central Valley of Chile. Agri.Water Manage., 87: 251 260.
Richards, L.A. 1954. Diagnosis and improvement of saline-alkali soils. Agricultural Handbook No. 60, USDA.
Sawyer, C.N. and McCarty, P.L. 1978. Chemistry for environmental Engineering .NY: Mc-Graw Hill, 532 p.
Subbiah, B.V. and Asija, G.L. 1956. A rapid procedure for the determination of available nitrogen in soils. Curr. Sci., 25: 259-260.
Umar, R., Ahmed, I. and Alam, F. 2009. Mapping groundwater vulnerable zones using modified Drastic approach of an alluvial aquifer in parts of central Ganga plain, western Uttar Pradesh. J. Geol. Soc. Ind., 73: 193-201.
Vrba, J. and Zoporozec, A. 1994. Guidebook on mapping groundwater Vulnerability , IAH International Contribution for Hydrogeology, Heise, Hannover, v.16, 131p.
WHO. 2004. . Third edition. World Guidelines for drinking water quality Health Organization, Geneva.
