Assessing Community Participation and Ecosystem Services from Common Property Resources of Hot Arid Ecosystem of Western Rajasthan

Authors

  • G.L. Bagdi ICAR-Central Arid Zone Research Institute, Regional Research Station, Bikaner, Rajasthan Author
  • Sheetal K. R. ICAR-Central Arid Zone Research Institute, Regional Research Station, Bikaner, Rajasthan; ICAR-Indian Institute of Soil and Water Conservation, Research Centre, Ooty, Tamil Nadu Author
  • Dileep Kumar ICAR-Central Arid Zone Research Institute, Regional Research Station, Jaisalmer, Rajasthan Author
  • Subbulakshmi V. ICAR-Central Arid Zone Research Institute, Regional Research Station, Bikaner, Rajasthan Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.53550/ijsc.v54.i2.231

Keywords:

Arid rajasthan, Common property resources (CPRs), Community participation, Ecosystem services, Pasture land, Village pond

Abstract

Common property resources (CPRs) are vital natural assets, particularly for tribal and rural poor with limited landholdings, who depend heavily on CPRs for livelihood, fuelwood and fodder needs. Most common CPRs in rural areas include common grazing lands, community forests, wastelands, and common water bodies. The CPRs in arid ecosystems provide not only fruits, vegetables, herbs, fibre, and even water for drinking and irrigation; but also income and employment opportunities. Considering their importance, these resources are jointly utilised and accessed by the community. The present study was undertaken in the Bikaner and Jaisalmer districts of western Rajasthan, India to assess the status of the CPRs, evaluate their impact on livelihoods and also to measure the extent of community participation in the management of these critical resources. A stratified random sampling was employed and data were collected from 720 households via personal interviews using standardized schedules to quantify ecosystem services from water harvesting structures and pasture lands. Results revealed majority of farmers (45.6%) possessing low socio-economic status but maintaining favourable attitude (42.6%) towards CPRs. Overall extent of people’s participation in CPR management was measured at 60.3%, with the highest engagement occurring during the development stage. Key ecosystem services included provision of water for domestic and livestock, fuel-wood, food materials and building materials, and increased cropping intensity. The study concludes that while CPRs are essential for subsistence, they are threatened by encroachment and invasive species. Establishing CPR management bodies and leveraging traditional "Oran" systems are essential to ensure sustainable regeneration and long-term livelihood security.

References

Arnold, J., & Stewarts, W. (1991). Common Property Resources Management in India. Oxford Forestry Institute, Oxford.

Bagdi, G. L., N. D. Yadava, Sheetal K. R., & D. K. Dangi. (2021). Development of a Scale to Measure Attitude of People towards Common Property Resources. Indian J. Ext. Educ., 57(3): 58-62. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5958/2454-552X.2021.00107.9

Chaudhry, P., Bohra, N.K., & Choudhary, K.R. (2011). Conserving biodiversity of community forests and rangelands of a hot arid region of India. Land Use Policy, 28(3): 506-513. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2010.10.005

Chopra, K., & S.C. Gulati. (2001). Migration, common property resources and environmental degradation Interlinkages in India's arid and semi-arid regions. SAGE Publications Pvt. Ltd. 163p.

DTE. (2012). The spirit of the sanctuary. Down to Earth. https://www.downtoearth.org.in/coverage/the-spirit-of-the-sanctuary-29329.

Dupdal, R., Naik, B. S., Ramesha, M. N., Ravi, K. N. and Rao, B. K. (2024). Water harvesting structure-farmpond for increasing crop yields and farm income in rainfed semiarid ecosystem of Karnataka. Indian J. Soil Cons., 52 (Global Soils Conference - 2024 Special Issue): S68-S73. DOI: https://doi.org/10.59797/ijsc.v52.i2.160

Fidler, R. Y., Ahmadia, G. N., Amkieltiela, Awaludinnoer, Cox, C., et al. (2022). Participation, not penalties: Community involvement and equitable governance contribute to more effective multiuse protected areas. Sci. Adv., 8(18), eabl8929. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.abl8929

Garnett, S. T., N. D. Burgess, J. E. Fa, Á. Fernández-Llamazares, Z. Molnár, et al. (2018). A spatial overview of the global importance of Indigenous lands for conservation. Nat. Sustain., 1: 369–374. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-018-0100-6

Gaur, M.K., R.K. Goyal, & Shiran, K. (2020). Common Property Resources as Village Ecosystem Service Centre in Drylands of Rajasthan, India. J. Rangeland Sci., 10(1): 57-71.

Hughes, K., Sharma, H., Priyadarshini, P. Vagen, T., Winowiecki, L., & Meinzen-Dick, R. (2024). Integrating Earth observation, biophysical, and survey data to evaluate the ecological impacts of a common land protection and restoration intervention in Rajasthan, India. Humanit. Soc. Sci. Commun., 11, 1535. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-024-04057-3

Jodha, N., & A. Bhatia. (1998). Community Management of the Commons: Re-empowerment Process and the Gaps. Presented at "Crossing Boundaries", the 7th Annual Conference of the International Association for the Study of Common Property (IASCP), Simon Fraser University, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, June 10-14, 1998.

Jodha, N. S. (1986). Common Property Resources and Rural Poor in Dry Regions of India. Economic and Political Weekly, 21(27): 1169-1181.

Josephat, M., O. V. Wasonga, D. Ikiror, H. Akala, C. Gachuiri, & G. Gitau. (2025). Prosopis juliflora (sw.) DC in the drylands: A review of invasion, impacts and management in Eastern Africa. Sustain. Environ., 11(1): 2521946. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/27658511.2025.2521946

Mertia, R. S., & Santra, P. (2012). Grazing practices in the rangelands of the Indian thar desert and its impact on ecosystem and environment. In J. Ramon (Ed.), Grazing Ecology: Vegetation and Soil Impact (pp. 7-26). NOVA Publication, NY.

Misra, A. K., & Kumawat, R. N. (2020). Common Grazing Resources of Hot Arid Zone of Rajasthan, India: Problems and Prospects. Ann. Arid Zone, 59(3&4): 83-94. DOI: https://doi.org/10.56093/aaz.v59i3-4.109656

Murphy, G. & Likert, R. (1937). Public Opinion and the Individual, New York: Harper.

NSSO. (1999). Common Property Resources in India, NSS 54th Round (January 1998–June 1998). Government of India.

Ostrom, E. (1990). Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action. Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511807763

Pretty, J. (2003). Social capital and the collective management of resources. Science, 302, 1912–1914. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1090847

Sandhu, H., Zhang, W., Meinzen-Dick, R., ElDidi, H., Perveen, S., Sharma, J., Kaur, J., & Priyadarshini, P. (2023). Valuing ecosystem services provided by land commons in India: implications for research and policy. Environ. Res. Lett., 18(1): 13001. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/acadf4

Singh, M., Kumar, L., Rajasekaran, A., Amaladas, P., & Anuja, H. (2024). Prosopis juliflora (Swartz) DC. invasion in protected areas of India under climate change. J. Nat. Conserv., 79: 126622. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnc.2024.126622

Singh, R.K., and Singh, R. J. 2024. Living With Nature: A Cultural and Scientific Perspective. Indian J. Soil Cons., 52 (Global Soil Conference-2024 Special Issue): S1-S13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.59797/ijsc.v52.i2.153

Downloads

Published

2026-08-24

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Assessing Community Participation and Ecosystem Services from Common Property Resources of Hot Arid Ecosystem of Western Rajasthan. (2026). Indian Journal of Soil Conservation, 54(2), 189-196. https://doi.org/10.53550/ijsc.v54.i2.231

Similar Articles

11-20 of 283

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.

Most read articles by the same author(s)