Assessment of effectiveness of extension methods for dissemination of soil and water conservation technologies

Authors

  • G.L. Bagdi Central Soil andWater Conservation Research and Training Institute, Research Centre,Vasad-388 306, District Anand, Gujarat. Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.53550/

Keywords:

Assessment, Dissemination, Extension methods, Soil & water conservation, technologies

Abstract

Study was initiated during 2004 with the objective to find out effective extension methods for dissemination of Soil and Water Conservation (SWC) technologies for watershed development. Frequency use and effectiveness indices along with structured schedules were developed to assess and evaluate different extension methods. The study revealed that majority of farmers were using radio and television more frequently for information on different agricultural and SWC technologies. The less frequently used extension methods by the farmers were bulletin and documentary film show, exhibition, study tour, result demonstration and method demonstration. It was also found that the most effective extension methods as perceived by farmers for dissemination of SWC technologies were farm and home visit in individual contact, discussion meeting and result demonstration in group contact and film show in mass contact. Whereas, according to officers of watershed development team and extension scientists the highly effective extension methods were farm and home visit in individual contact methods, result demonstration, study tour, lecture and discussion meeting in group contact methods and they considered none of extension method highly effective in mass contact methods. The study concludes that most effective extension methods as perceived by both, the farmers and officers were, farm and home visit in individual contact, result demonstration in group contact and bulletin as well as documentary film show in mass contact methods, for effective dissemination of SWCtechnologies for watershed management.

References

Kerkhof, P. 1990. Agroforestry in Africa: A survey of experience, Panos Publications limited,Angel house, London, UK, pp. 200-205.

Peterson,A.W. 1955. Evaluation of Extension Methods Employed in Farm and Home Development in the West, J. Farm Econ, 37(5): 1298-1301.

Sim, D. and H.A. Hilmi, 1987. Forestry Extension Methods. FAO Forestry paper 80. FAO, Rome, Italy.

Simute. S. 1992. Agro-forestry. Manual for extension workers with emphasis on small-scale farmers in Eastern province, Zambia (Technical Handbook No.2). RSCU, SIDA, Nairobi, Kenya.

Singh, Jogender, Chahal, V.C. and Vidyulata, 2003. Media use profile of farmers of Haryana, J. Extn. Edu 39(3&4): 147-152.

Singh, R.P. 1993. Dryland agriculture and technological options: Issues and approaches for watershed development, J. RuralDev 12(1): 21-33.

Swaminathan, M.S., 1998. The watershed concept, University News, 36(19): 14-17.

Downloads

Published

2026-01-24

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Assessment of effectiveness of extension methods for dissemination of soil and water conservation technologies. (2026). Indian Journal of Soil Conservation, 42(1), 114-118. https://doi.org/10.53550/

Similar Articles

1-10 of 433

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.

Most read articles by the same author(s)