Effect of multipurpose trees on growth and yield of ginger (Zingibar officinale Roscoe.) and turmeric (Curcuma longa L.) grown as intercrops in Arunachal Pradesh of North East India
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.53550/Keywords:
Alnus nepalensis, Benefit cost ratio, Leaf area indexAbstract
One of the most commonly adopted strategies for addressing environmental degradation in rural areas of the tropics is agroforestry. In jhum and degraded land, plantation of fast growing multipurpose tree species play major role not only in rehabilitation of degraded lands but also increase the net productivity of these lands with proper crop tree combination. Keeping this in view, performance of two rhizomatous crops i.e.,turmeric (Curcuma longa) and ginger (Zingibar officinale) was evaluated under rainfed conditions as sole crops and with 15-year old well established stands of forest tree species located at the research farm of ICAR Research Complex for NEH Region, Research Centre, Basar, Arunachal Pradesh. The average illumination below the canopies varied from 72.0 to 79.2% of incident radiation on turmeric and 71.7 to 78.8% of incident radiation on ginger. Turmeric and ginger were cultivated in the inter row spaces of 24 and 12 Multipurpose trees (MPTs), respectively. Turmeric and ginger did not perform well under as many as 18 and 5 MPTs, respectively. Turmeric, in association with nitrogen fixing tree species Alnus nepalensis and Parkia roxburghii did not significantly reduce its productivity. Leaf area and leaf area index (LAI) was significantly higher under A. nepalensis than the sole turmeric crop. However, MPTs had significantly negative effect on the growth and yield attributes of ginger crop. The reduction in yield of ginger ranged from 11.3 to 31.3%. It may be inferred that turmeric cultivation was more profitable than the ginger and both the crops showed highest benefit:cost ratio i.e., 3.10 and 2.36, respectively under A. nepalensis based agroforestry systems in comparison to the other MPT based agroforestry systems.
References
Ancy, J. and Jayachandran, B.K. 1994. Leaf area measurement in ginger (Zingiber officinaleR.). South Indian Hortic., 42: 6-57.
Bisht, J.K., Chandra, S. and Singh, R.D. 2004. Performance of taro (Colocasia esculenta) and turmeric (Curcuma longa) under fodder trees in an agri-silvi-horti system of western Himalaya. Indian J. Agric. Sci., 74: 291-294.
Das, D.K.,Chaturvedi, O.P.,Jha,R.K. and Kumar,R. 2011.Yield,soil health and economics of a onla (Emblica officinalis Gaertn.)- based agri horticultural systems in eastern India.Curr.Sci.,101(6):786-790.
Dhyani, S.K. and Chauhan, D.S. 1989. Evaluation of crops in relation to shade intensities of Khasi pine (Pinus kesiya). Progress Report, AICRPon Agroforestry, ICAR, New Delhi.
Dyack, B., Rollins, K. and Gordon, A.M. 1999. An economic analysis of market and non-market benefits of a temperate intercropping system insouthernOntario, Canada. Agroforest. Syst., 44:197-214.
Ghosh, S.N. and Pal, P.P. 2010. Effect of inter cropping on plant and soil of Mosambi sweet orange orchard under rainfed conditions. Indian J. Hortic. 67(2): 185-190.
ISFR. 2011. India State of Forest Report. Forest Survey of India. Ministry of Forests and Environment, Government of India, Dehradun (www.fsi.nic.in).
Jaswal, S.C., Mishra, V.K. and Verma, K.S. 1993. Intercropping ginger and turmeric with poplar (Populus deltoides 'G-3' Marsh.). Agroforest. Syst., 22 (20): 111-117.
Mohanty, D.C., Pattnaik, A.K., Senapati, A.K. and Dash, D.K. 1998. Ecological implication of turmeric cultivation in the Eastern Ghats of Orissa. Environ. Ecol., 16: 468-470.
Nair, P.K.R. 1993. An Introduction to Agroforestry. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.
Pradhan, U.B., Maiti, S. and Pal, S. 2003. Effect of frequency of pruning and tree spacing of Leucaena on the growth and productivity of turmeric when grown under alley cropping system with Leucaena leucocephala. J. Interacademicia., 7: 11-20.
Rao, D.V.R. and Swamy, G.S. 1984. Studies on the effect of N, Pand K on growth, yield and quality of turmeric. South Indian Hortic., 32: 288-291.
Saha, R., Tomar, J.M.S. and Ghosh, P.K. 2007. Evaluation and selection of multipurpose tree for improving soil hydro-physical behaviour under hilly eco-system of north east India. Agroforest. Syst., 69(3): 239-247.
Sanchez, P.A. and Logan, T.J. 1992. Myths and science about the chemistry and fertility of soils in the tropics. In Lal, R. and P.A. Sanchez, eds. Myths and science of the soils of the tropics. SSSA special publication, Soil Science Society of America, Madison, WI, USA, 29: 35-46.
Sharma, E. 1993. Nutrient dynamics in Himalayan Alder plantations. Anna. Bot., 72: 329-336.
Sundararaj, D.D. and Thulasidas, G. 1976. Botany of Field Crops. The Macmillan Company of India Ltd. Delhi
Thevathasan, N.V., Gordon, A.M., Simpson, J.A., Reynolds, P.E., Price, G.W. and Zhang, P. 2004. Biophysical and ecological interactions in a temperate tree-based intercropping system. J. Crop Improve., 12(1-2): 339-363.
