Conservation agriculture in rice and maize based cropping systems for enhancing crop and water productivity: participatory technology demonstration in north-east India
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.53550/Keywords:
Livelihood, Maize, Participatory researchAbstract
Conservation Agriculture (CA) in rice (Oryza sativa L.) and maize (Zea mays L.) based cropping systems for crop diversification and higher productivity was demonstrated in a participatory mode in 15 farmers' field covering 10 villages across Ri-Bhoi District, Meghalaya during 2010-12. The results indicated significant improvement in cropping intensity, crop and water productivity, employment and income due to adoption of CA approach compared to the Farmers' Practice (FP) of monocropping under conventional tillage. Minimum tillage was followed for kharif crops and no-till was practiced for dry season crops. French bean and rapeseed was grown after maize and pea and lentil was grown after lowland rice with conserved moisture resulting in doubling of cropping intensity. The productivity enhancement in terms of Rice Equivalent Yield (REY) with rice-pea sequence under CA was 229% compared to FP of rice monocropping. Similarly, maize-French bean under CA recorded 168% higher maize equivalent yield (MEY) compared to monocropping of maize. The maximum enhancement in net return was observed with maize-French bean (465%) followed by rice-pea (360%) under CA over respective FP. Adoption of CA resulted substantial improvement in employment of farmers. Adoption of CA enhanced water use efficiency (WUE) by 12% with maize-rapeseed sequence to as high as 228% under rice-pea sequence. Maximum WUE was achieved with rice-pea system under CA (19.69 kg ha mm) followed by rice-lentil sequence (12.34 kgha mm) compared to 5.99 kg ha mm under monocropping of rice and 6.23 kg ha mm under monocropping of maize under FP. The water productivity of rice- pea (9.57 m water) and maize-French bean (6.59 m water) sequences were almost four times higher compared to that under FP of monocropping rice ( 2.66m water) and maize (1.80m water). Thus, the study indicated opportunity of CA in north eastern hill region for conserving natural resources and enhancing productivity.
References
Abrol, I.P. and Sangar, S. 2006. Sustaining Indian agriculture conservation agriculture theway forward.Curr. Sci., 91(8):1020-1025.
Aune, J.B. 2009. Conservation, Organic and Conventional Agriculture Compared- Impacts on food production and the environment. Abstracts of 4 world congress on conservation agriculture, 243 p.
Balasubramanian, P. and Palaniappan, S.P. 2007. Principles of Agronomy, Agrobios India, pp. 268-270.
Bray, R.H. and Kurtz, 2.T. 1945. Determination of total organic and available forms of phosphorus in soils. Soil Sci., 59: 39-45.
Das, Anup., Patel, D.P., Munda, G.C., Ghosh, P.K., Ngachan, S.V., Choudhury, B.U., G.I. Ramkrushna., R, Saha., Rajkhowa, D.J., Panwar, A.S., Kumar, Rajesh., Kumar Manoj and Buragohain, Juri. 2011. Conservation agriculture in rice and maize based cropping systems: package and practices for NEH Region. Research Bulletin No. 75. ICAR Research Complex for NEH Region, Umiam, Meghalaya, 36 p.
Das, Anup., Patel, D.P., Ramkrushna, G.I., Munda, G.C., Ngachan, S.V., Buragohain, J., Kumar, M and Naropongla. 2013. Crop diversification, crop and energy productivity under raised and sunken beds: results from a seven-year study in a high rainfall organic production system. Biol. Agric. Hort, 30(2): 73-87.
De Wit, C.T. 1960. On competition. Verslag Land-bouwkundige Onderzoekingen. Wageningen, 66: 18.
Ghosh, P.K., Das Anup, Saha, R. and Tomar, J.M.S. 2010a. Improving mustard yield through in-situ soil moisture conservation and conservation tillage in foot hills of Meghalaya. Ind. J. Soil Cons.,38(3): 184-187.
Ghosh, P.K., Das, Anup, Saha, R., Kharkarang, E., Tripathi, A. K., Munda G.C. and Ngachan S.V. 2010b. Conservation agriculture towards achieving food securityinNorthEast India. Curr. Sci., 99(7): 915-921.
Grarras, O.E., Brahli, A.E. and Mourid, M.E. 2009. No-till system applied to Northern African rainfed agriculture: Case of Morocco. Lead Paper presented in 4 World Congress on Conservation Agriculture at New Delhi, India, 4-7 February, 2009.
Hashim, M.A.A., Siam, N., Al-Dosari, A., Asl-Gaddi, K.A., Patil, V.C., Toal E.H.M., Rangaswamy, M. and Samdani, M.S. 2012. Determination of water requirement and crop water productivity of crops grown in the Makkah Region of Saudi Arabia. Aust. J. Basic App. Sci., 6(9): 196-206.
Jackson, M.L. 1973. Soil chemical analysis. Prentice Hall of India, New Delhi.
Morgan, J.M. 2003. Making the most of available water in wheat production. NSW Agriculture, agnote. http://www.dpi.nsw.gov.au, accessed on 9 February, 2014.
Sangar, S. and Abrol, I.P. 2005. Conservation agriculture for transition to sustainable agriculture. Curr. Sci., 88: 686-687.
Sharma, NK., Ghosh, B.N., Khola, O.P.S. and Dubey, R.K. 2013. Residue and tillage management for soil moisture conservation in post maize harvesting period under rainfed conditions of north-west Himalayas. Ind. J. Soil Cons., 41(3): 287-292.
Subbiah, B.V. and G.L. Asija. 1956. A rapid procedure for the determination of available nitrogen in soils. Curr. Sci., 25: 259-260.
Taha, M. and Gulati, J.M.L. 2001. Influence of irrigation on yield and moisture utilization of groundnut (Arachis hypogea L.). Indian J. Agron., 46(3): 523-527.
Walkley, A. and Black, J.A. 1934. Estimation of soil organic carbon by chromic acid titration method. Soil Sci., 17: 29-38.
