Role and significance of silt detention dams to sustain the functional life of a rapidly silting lake at Chandigarh
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.53550/Keywords:
Seepage and evaporation losses, Shivalik hills, Siltation of lakes, Silt detention dams, Water storage capacityAbstract
A detailed study was conducted during 2010-2011 to find out the present Storage Capacity (SC) of all the water bodies (WB) created behind the Silt Detention Dams (SDDs), their siltation rate, amount of silt arrested and possibilities of release of water to augment lake storage. 150 functional WBs were identified having combined SC of 254.2 hectare meters (ha-m) which was 48% of Lake SC of 532 ha-m. In the good monsoon season of 2010 when 1332 mm of rainfall was recorded against the average of 1120 mm, these WBs retained 217 ha-m or 41% of Lake storage indicating that a substantial part of runoff was retained by the SDDs. The subsequent loss of 137 ha-m through seepage and evaporation till May, 2011 was loss of much needed water by the Lake. Out of 150 WBs, 28 were totally silted, 38 had less than one and 36 between 1 to 2 ha-m storage and likely to silt in next 6 to 8 years. The silt load to these WBs was still around 40 t ha-1yr-1 necessitating the desiltation of these 102 WBs so that silt flow to the Lake remains under check. There were 48 WBs with SC between 2 to 7 ha-m which would not need desiltation for long and could donate with proper mechanism around 83.3 ha-m in good, around 60 in normal and 40 in low rainfall years after retaining sufficient water for wildlife and also keep tourist interest alive. The quantity of silt arrested by SDDs was worked out as 137.76 ha-m or 20,66,400 tons. The study concluded that the degraded micro- catchments continued to release silt load of 40 t ha-1yr-1 inspite of best treatment and hence the provision of SDDs was necessary to bring down initial silt loads to the Lake. The desiltation of these WBs would be necessary on reducing scale to save the Lake from further siltation. It was possible to release water to the Lake depending upon rainfall situation from 48 larger WBs.
References
Bansal, R.C. and Grewal, S.S. 1986. Studies on Sedimentation of Sukhna Lake, Chandigarh: Corrective measures and Hydrology. Annual Progress Report, 1986, Central Soil and Water Conservation Research and Training Institute, Research Centre, Chandigarh, 6 p.
Bansal, R.C and Grewal, S.S. 1990. Studies on Sedimentation of Sukhna Lake: Corrective Measures and Hydrology. Annual Report, 1990, Central Soil and Water Conservation Research & Training Institute Research Centre, Chandigarh, 6 p. Bhumbla, D.R. 1976. Soil conservation in Shivaliks. Indian Farm., 25:1-2.
Brandt, S.A. 2000. A review of reservoir desiltation. Internl. J. Sediment Res., 15(3): 321-342.
Frevert, R.K, Schwab, G.B, Edminster, T.W. and Bernes, K.K. 1955. Soil and Water Conservation. John Wiley & Sons ING, New York, 479 p.
Glover, Harold. 1944. Erosion in the Punjab, its causes and cure. A survey of soil conservation. The civil and military Gazette Lahore.
Gorrie, R.M. 1946. Soil conservation in the Punjab. Government Printing Press, Lahore.
Grewal, S.S. 1995. Hoshiarpur torrents, their extent, causes, characteristics, and control measures. In: Sastry G., Sharda, V.N., Guyal, G.P. and Samra, J.S. (Eds). Torrent Menace, Challenges, and Opportunities. Publication of the Central Soil and Water Conservation Research and Training Institute Dehra Dun, India.
Grewal, S.S. and Juneja, M.L. 1984. Studies on the erosional behaviour of the soil in the catchment of a rapidly silting Lake at Chandigarh. J. Soil Conserv., 12(1): 58-65.
Grewal, S.S., Juneja, M.L, Mittal, S.P., Agrihotri, Y. and Bansal, R.C. 1990. Effect of some hydrophysical soil properties on erosion, seepage and grass yield from a Shivalik watershed. Ind. J. Soil Conserv: 18(1&2): 48-55.
Grewal, S.S., Mittal, S.P., Agrihotri, Y. and Bansal R.C. 1988. Study on hydrology of a small eroded Shivalik watershed managed for rainwater harvesting and its utilization. Indian J. Dryland Agric. Res. Dev., 2: 31-40.
Grewal. S.S. and Juneja M.L. 1991. Alkali soils in forest hills of Shivaliks landscape and their management. J. Soil Water Conser. India, 35(1&2): 55-59.
Grewal, S.S. 2014. Impact of soil conservation measures in the catchment of a rapidly silting lake at Chandigarh: 2 Vegetation recovery and need for future managmement practices. Ind. J. Soil Cons., 42(3): 119-129.
Jain, T.C., Grewal, S.S. and Dogra, A.S. 1998. Rehabilitation of degraded Shiwalik ecosystem through integrated watershed management. In: Principles and Practices of Integrated Watershed Management in India, Publication of Indo-German Bilateral Project, New Delhi.
Nallonathel, M. and Santhanan, N. 2014. Reservoir sedimentation – a sample analysis on Malampuzha Dam, Kerela. Internl. J. Sci. Res., 9(3): 505-508.
Shrimali, S.S. 1999. Rainfall-runoff modeling using remote sensing and GIS – A case study of Sukhna Lake catchment. Centre for Space Science and Technology Education in Asia and Pacific IRS Campus 4, Kalidas Road Dehra Dun (India).
Sohal, H.S. 2000. Soil and water conservation measures for sediment control in Sukhna Lake, Chandigarh. In: Mittal, S.P; Aggarwal, R.K. and Samra, J.S. 2000 (eds). Fifty Years of Research on Sustainable Resource Management in Shivaliks. Publication of the Central Soil and Water Conservation Research and Training Institute, Research Centre, Chandigarh 160019. India. pp. 259-266.
SPACE, 2009. Impact of soil and water conservation measures in the catchment of Sukhna Lake on ground water, soil, and geology. Publication of the Society for Promotion and Conservation of Environment, Chandigarh, 144 p
