Moisture conservation practices in maize-mustard cropping system: Effects on productivity, water use and soil fertility

Authors

  • Praveen Jakhar ICAR-Indian Institute of Soil and Water Conservation, Reserach Centre, Koraput-763 002, Odisha Author
  • K.S. Rana ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi-110 012 Author
  • Anchal Dass ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi-110 012 Author
  • Anil K. Choudhary ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi-110 012 Author
  • Mukesh Choudhary ICAR-Indian Grassland and Fodder Research Institute, Jhansi-284003, Uttar Pradesh Author
  • Partha Pratim Adhikary ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi-110 012 Author
  • Jyotshnarani Maharana Orissa University of Agriculture and Technology, Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Semiliguda, Koraput-763 002, Odisha Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.53550/

Keywords:

Hydrogel, Maize, Mustard, Residue, Ridge and furrow, Zero tillage

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted at the Research Farm of ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute (IARI), New Delhi during kharif and rabi seasons of 2014-15 and 2015-16 with the objective to study the effect of different moisture enhancing practices and conservation tillage on performance of maize-mustard cropping system and soil properties. The main plot treatments consisted of four moisture conservation practices in kharif season maize viz., ridges and furrows (RF), RF + crop residue (CR) -1 -1 4 t ha , RF + CR 2 t ha + VAM and flat sowing (FS). Five zero tillage (ZT) management -1 techniques in rabi season mustard viz., ZT, ZT + seed priming, ZT + CR 4 t ha , ZT + -1 CR 2 t ha + Hydrogel and conventional tillage (CT) were executed in sub plots under cropping system mode. The experiment was laid out in split-plot design with three -1 replications. Maize kernel yield in RF + CR 4 t ha treatment was 10.6, 29.4 and 46.5% -1 higher than RF + CR 2 t ha + VAM, RF and FS (control) treatments, respectively. -1 Whereas, in sub-plots (residual effects), ZT + CR 4 t ha recorded maximum kernel -1 -1 -1 yield (3.05 t ha ) followed by ZT + CR 2 t ha + Hydrogel (2.99 t ha ) treatment. Significantly higher mustard yield of 11.5, 23.1 and 35.8% was obtained in RF + CR 4 t -1 -1 ha treatment over RF + CR 2 t ha + VAM, RF and FS, respectively because of the residual effects of treatments. Whereas, for mustard, direct effects of different planting -1 -1 methods in sub-plots gave maximum yield (2.05 t ha ) in ZT + CR 4 t ha which was -1 -1 closely followed by ZT + CR 2 t ha + Hydrogel (1.95 t ha ). Cumulative effects (direct and residual) showed that bulk density (BD), saturated hydraulic conductivity, infiltration rate and penetration resistance remained unaffected with treatments. -1 Significantly higher availability of nitrogen (149 and 150 kg ha ), phosphorus (14.5 -1 -1 and 15.6 kg ha ) and potassium (193 and 192 kg ha ) in soil was registered under the -1 -1 best yielding treatments i.e. RF + CR 4 t ha and ZT + CR 4 t ha in maize and mustard crops, respectively. Therefore, the adoption best treatment will give sustainable yield of maize and mustard besides maintaining soil health under rainfed conditions.

References

Arora, S. and Bhatt, R. 2008. Impact of improved soil and in-situ water conservation practices on productivity in rainfed foothill region of th North-west India. In: Proc. 15 Annual conference of International Society of Soil Conservation, Budapest.

Bhatt, R. 2017. Zero Tillage Impacts on Soil Environment and Properties. J. Env. Agri. Sci., 10: 1-19.

Bouwer, H. 1986. Intake rate: cylinder infiltrometer. In: Method of Soil Analysis, Part 1, Physical and Mineralogical Properties, Agronomy Monograph No. 9. Klute, A. (Ed.). American Society of Agronomy, Madison, Wisconsin, USA, pp. 825-843.

th Chopra, S.L. and Kanwar, J.S. 1991. Analytical Agriculture Chemistry. 4 Edn., Kalyani Publishers, New Delhi, 301p.

Choudhary, M. 2015. Crop residue and sulphur management in pearl milletmustard cropping system under different tillage practices. Ph. D. Thesis submitted to IARI, New Delhi-110012, 125 p.

DAC. 2017. Agricultural Statistics at a Glance 2014. Directorate of Economics and Statistics, Department of Agriculture and Cooperation, Ministry of Agriculture, Government of India. 423 p. Farmers' portal. 2016. www.farmer.gov.in/normalmaizeproductiontechnologies.pf

Gebrekidan, H. and Uloro, Y. 2015. Yield response of maize (Zea mays L.) to tied ridges and planting methods on Entisols and Vertisols of the eastern Ethiopian highlands. In abstracts: Tropical Agriculture. The University of West Indies at St. Augustine, Trinidad and Tobago, 88(4).

Gomez, K.A. and Gomez, A.A. 2010. Statistical procedures for agricultural and research, 2 ed. John Wiley and Sons, New York. 704 p.

Haynes, R.J. 1993. Effects of sample pre-treatment on aggregate stability measured by wet sieving of turbidimetry on soils of different cropping history. J. Soil Sci., 44: 261-270.

Jackson, M.L. 1958. Soil chemical analysis, Asian Publication House, New Delhi, pp. 173-195.

Jackson, M.L. 1973. Soil chemical analysis. Prentice Hall Inc., Englewood, Cliffs, USA, pp. 159-174.

Karki, T.B. and Shrestha, J. 2014. Maize Production under No-Tillage System in Nepal. World J. Agri. Res., 2 (6A): 13-17.

Karunakaran, V. and Behera, U.K. 2015. Influence of sequential tillage and residue management practices on soil and root parameters in soybean (Glycine max)-wheat (Triticum aestivum) cropping system. Indian J. Agri. Sci., 85(2): 182-188.

Kebede, H., Sui, R.X., Fisher, D.K., Reddy, K.N., Bellaloui, N. and Molin, W.T. 2014. Corn Yield Response to Reduced Water Use at Different Growth Stages. Agri. Sci., 5: 1305-1315.

Kemper, W.D. and Rosenau, R.C. 1986. Aggregate stability and size distribution. In: Method of Soil Analysis, Part 1, Physical and Mineralogical Properties, Agronomy Monograph No. 9. Klute, A. (Ed.). American Society of Agronomy, Madison, Wisconsin, USA, pp. 425-442.

Kumar, R., Bohra, J.S., Kumawat, N., Singh and Kumar, A. 2015. Fodder yield, nutrient uptake and quality of baby corn (Zea mays L.) as influenced by NPKS and Zn fertilization. Res. Crops, 16(2): 243-249.

Kumari, C.R. and Sudheer, M.J. 2016. On farm demonstration of zero tillage maize in farmers' fields of Anantapuram district of Andhra Pradesh. Int. J. Agri. Sci., 12(1): 134-138.

Kuotsu, K., Munda, G.C., Das, A. and Verma, B.C. 2014. Soil health as affected by altered land configuration and conservation tillage in a groundnut (Arachis hypogaea)-toria (Brassica campestris var. toria) cropping system. Indian J. Agri. Sci., 84(2): 241-247.

Mishra, R.D. and Ahmad, M. 1987. Manual on irrigation Agronomy. Oxford and IBH Publishing Co. Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi, India. 412 p.

Olsen, S.R., Cole, C.L., Watanabe, F.S. and Dean, L.A. 1954. Estimation of available phosphorus in soil by extraction with sodium bicarbonate. USDA Circular No. 939, Washington, pp. 72-75.

Saha, R. and Ghosh, P.K. 2013. Soil organic carbon stock, moisture availability and crop yield as influenced by residue management and tillage practices in maize-mustard cropping system under hill agro-ecosystem. National Acad. Sci. Letters, 36(5): 461-468.

Saha, S., Chakraborty, D., Sharma, A.R., Tomar, R.K., Bhadraray, S., Sen, U., Behera, U.K., Purakayastha, T.J., Garg, R.N. and Kalra, N. 2010. Effect of tillage and residue management on soil physical properties and crop productivity in maize (Zea mays)-Indian mustard (Brassica juncea) system. Indian J. Agri. Sci., 80(8): 679-685.

Singh, B. and Malhi, S.S. 2006. Response of soil physical properties to tillage and residue management on two soils in a cool temperate environment. Soil Till. Res., 85: 143-153.

Singh, R.P., Yadav, P.N., Uttam, S.K., Katiyar, S.C. and Tripathi, A.K. 2012. Effect of moisture conservation and nutrient management on growth, yield and water use efficiency of sorghum (Sorghum bicolor) under rainfed conditions. Curr. Adv. Agri. Sci., 4(1): 37-40.

Singh, S.S., Singh, A.K. and Sundaram, P.K. 2014. Agro technological options for upscaling agricultural productivity in eastern Indo-gangetic plains under impending climate change situations: A review. J. Agrisearch, 1(2): 55-65.

Subbiah, B.V. and Asija, G.L. 1956. A rapid procedure for the estimation of available nitrogen in soils. Curr. Sci., 25(8): 259-260.

Thakur, N.S., Kushwaha, B.B. and Sinha, N.K. 2011. Productivity and water use in kharif sorghum (Sorghum bicolor) under different land configuration and mulching. Indian J. Agron., 56(1): 47-51.

Thierfelder, C. and Wall, P.C. 2012. Effects on conservation agriculture on soil quality and productivity in contrasting agro-ecological environments of Zimbabwe. Soil Use Manage., 28: 209-220.

Wright, A.L. and Hons, F.M. 2005. Tillage impacts on soil aggregation and carbon and nitrogen sequestration under wheat cropping sequences. Soil Till. Res., 84(1): 67-75.

Zhang, F., Jinghua, M.L., Li, F. and Sun, G. 2015. Plastic Film Mulching Increases Soil Respiration in Ridge-furrow Maize Management. Arid Land Res. Manage., 29: 432-453.

Downloads

Published

2025-12-29

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Moisture conservation practices in maize-mustard cropping system: Effects on productivity, water use and soil fertility. (2025). Indian Journal of Soil Conservation, 45(3), 288-295. https://doi.org/10.53550/

Similar Articles

1-10 of 70

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.