Assessment of some soil physical indicators in severely eroded lands of southern Karnataka
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.53550/Keywords:
Land degradation, Lateritic soil, Soil erosion, Soil physical indicatorsAbstract
Water erosion is the major type of land degradation in Karnataka affecting 30.9% geographical area in the state in which Kolar is the most severely affected district in Southern Karnataka. Remote sensing technique was used to identify the hot spots. Seven profiles were opened in two transects, one near Jankamakote village (named as JKT with five profiles) and another one at Bhaktarahalli village (named as BHT with two profiles) and investigated the impact of water erosion on soil physical indicators. Pedon 2 of JKT under natural scrub forest recorded highest infiltration rate and Pedon-3 recorded the lowest infiltration rate because the soil was crusted and compacted. Highest bulk density (1.7 Mg m ) was observed in Pedon 4 in JKT. The texture of surface horizons in all the pedons were sandy clay or sandy clay loam. Available soil water in different Pedons varied from 67.4 to 288.4 mm. Pedon- 4 of JKT retained only 67.4 mm water because of severe erosion, shallow depth and higher bulk density. Pedon-1 of BHT retained maximum water (132.1 mm) compared to Pedon-2 (96.1 mm).The highest amount of micro-aggregates observed under natural forest soil and the least was in severely eroded lands. Porosity of the soil in different Pedons varied from 33.6 to 44.7%. Clay dispersion in different Pedons ranged from 2.9 to 14.4%. Clay dispersion was highest in the lowland soil (Pedon-5). The differences in soil physical qualities at various degrees are attributed to the impact of soil erosion coupled with incorrect land use. Soil and water conservation measures are highly needed in sloping areas to restore the soil physical quality.
References
Bhaskar, B.P. and Subbaiah, G.V. 1995. Genesis, Characterization and classification of laterities and associated soils along the east coast of Andhra Pradesh. J. Indian Soc. Soil Sci 43: 107-112.
Chaney, K. and Swift, R.S. 1986. Studies on aggregate stability I: Reformation of soil aggregates. Soil Sci., 37: 329-335.
Dadhwal, K.S., Mandal, D. Srimali, S.S., Mohan, S.C., Raizada, A. and Sankar, M. 2012. Impact of different land use systems on soil properties in a watershed of lower Himalayan vegion. Ind. J. Soil Cons. 40(2): 129-134.
Datta, M., Saha, P.K. and Chaudhury, H.P. 1990. Erodibility characteristics of soils in relation to soil characteristics and topography. J. Indian Soc. Soil Sci., 38: 495-498.
Dutta, D., Baruah, Utpal, Sarkar, Dipak and Dutta, S.P. 2014. Unfolding the feasibility of rabi cropping through soil moisture characterization in Sibsagar district of Assam, India. Ind. J. Soil Cons 42: 46-53.
Goldberg, S. 1989. Interaction of aluminum and iron oxides and clay minerals and their effect on soil physical properties: a review. Comm.Soil Sci. Plant Analy. 20(11&12): 1181-1207.
Hur,M. Ben and Letey, J. 1989. Effect of polysaccharides, clay dispersion, and impact energyon water infiltration. 53(1):233-238.
Jackson, M.L. 1973, Soil chemical analysis, Printice Hall, New Delhi.
Jankauskas, B., Jankauskien and Fullen, M.A. 2008. Soil erosion and changes in the physical properties of Lithuanian Eutric Albeluvisols under different land use systems, , 58(1): 66-76.
Khera, K.L. and Kahlon, M.S. 2005. Impact of land use pattern on soil erosion in sub-montane Punjab. 33: 204-206.
Mahapatra, S.K., Walia, C.S., Sidhu, G.S., Rana, K.P.C. and Tarsem Lal. 2000. Characterization and classification of the soils of different physio-graphic units in the sub-humid and co-system of Kashmir region. ., 48: 572-577.
Mehta,Ashwani, K., Khera, K.L. and Bhushan, Bharat. 2005. Effect of soil physical properties and land use on soil erodibility. 33: 180-182.
Nkongolo V. Nsalambi, and Plassmeyer, J. Christopher. 2010. Effect of vegetation type on soil physical properties at Lincoln University Living Laboratory. 4: 1-13.
Opara, C.C. 2009. Soil microaggregates stability under different land use types in southeastern Nigeria. Catena, 79: 103-112.
Peng, Tao and Wang, Shi-jie. 2012. Effects of Land Use, Land Cover and Rainfall Regimes on the Surface Runoff and Soil Loss on Karst Slopes in Southwest China. 90: 53-62.
Rajamannar,A. and Krishnamoorthy, K.K. 1978.Anote on the influence of altitude on the physico-chemical characters of forest soils. ., 26: 399-400.
Rengasamy, P., Greene, R.S.B., Ford, G.W. and Mehanni, A.H. 1984. Identification of dispersive behaviour and management of red-brown earths. 22: 413-431.
Richards, L.A. 1954. Diagnosis and improvement of saline and alkali soils. Handbook No.60, U.S. Dept. Agric., Washington. D.C.
Saha, R. and Mishra, V.K. 2007. Long term effect of various land use systems on physical properties of silty clay loam soil of North eastern hills. J. Indian Soc. Soil Sci., 55: 112-118.
Sarma, P.K. and Das, M. 1996. Effect of aggregating agents on synthesis of micro aggregates and physical properties of an Alfisol. J. Indian Soc. Soil Sci ., 44: 12-15.
Sharma, Rishabh Dev, Sarkar Rupak and Dutta, Subashisa. 2013. Run-off generation from fields with different land use and land covers under extreme storm. Events. Curr. Sci.,104: 1046-1053.
Sehgal, J. and Abrol, I.P. 1994. Soil degradation in India: status and impact. Oxford and IBH, New Delhi.
Shinde, S.S., Magar, S.S. and Kale, S.P. 1983. Infiltration characters in relation to tillage practices and initial soil moisture in sandy loam soil. NBSS Publ. Madras Agric. J., 70: 727-737.
Shivaprasad, Reddy, R.S., Sehgal, J. and Velayutham, M. 1998. Soil of Karnataka for optimizing land use. (Soils of India series) National Bureau of soil survey and land use planning, Nagpur, India, 47p.
Sitanggang, Masri, Rao, V.S., Nayan Ahmed and Mahapatra, S.K. 2006. Characterization and classification of soils in watershed area of Shikolpur, Gurgaon district, Haryana. J. Indian Soc. Soil Sci., 54: 106-110.
