Howmuch is a watershed worth?Anassessment
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.53550/Keywords:
Direct benefit, Employment, Indirect benefit, WatershedAbstract
India accords high priority to watershed programmes as a strategy for integrated rural development in drought-prone areas. Watershed development programmes are public funded and thus, valuation of different kinds of indirect benefits to the individual/society in addition to the direct visible benefits are important to support public policies on watershed programmes. The present study attempted to assess various kinds of indirect benefits associated with a watershed project along with visible direct benefits in terms of incremental returns from agriculture. The results showed that due to shift in cropping pattern and enhancement of productivity levels, net returns from agriculture and horticulture increased by around 7.43 lakh yr . Whereas, values of various recurring indirect benefits were estimated at 9.80 lakh yr and single period benefits due to employment creation and changes in asset value was 30.01 lakh, which demonstrated that indirect benefits out of natural resource conservation activities are much higher than the direct benefits from the watershed.
References
Chopra, K., Kadekodi, G.K. and Murthy, M.N. 1990. Participatory development, people and common property resources Sage Publication,NewDelhi, India.
Chopra, K. and Kadekodi, K.G. 1993.Watershed development: Acontrast with NREP/JRY. Econ. Pol.Weekly, 28(26):A-61.
Chopra, K. and Kadekodi, G.K. 1997. Natural resources accounting in the Yamuna basin: Accounting for forest resources. Ministry of Environment and Forests, India.
Constanza, R., d'Arge, R. deGroot, R., Farber, S., Grasso, M., Hannon, B., Limburg, K., Naeem, S., O'Neill, R.V., Paruelo, J., Raskin, R.G., Sutoon, P. and van den Belt M. 1997. The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature387: 253-260.
Deshpande, R.S. and Narayanamoorthy, A. 1999.An appraisal of watershed development programme a cross regions. ArthaVij.41(4): 348-351.
Deshpande, R.S. and Reddy,V.R. 1991. Watershed development approach in fragile resource regions: An analytical study of Maharashtra. Mimeograph Series No. 33, Gokhale Institute of Politics and Economics, Pune.
ICAR 1997. Handbook of Agriculture. Indian Council of Agricultural Research, New Delhi
India Task Force, 1987. Report of the Task Force to evaluate impact of sheep and goat rearing in ecologically fragile zone. Department of Agriculture & Co-operation, Ministry of Agriculture, New Delhi
Kerr, J., Pangare, G. and Pangare, V.L. 2002. Watershed development projects in India: An evaluation. Research Report 127, International Food Policy Research Institute, Washington D.C, USA.
Mishra P.K. and Mondal, B. 2008. Employment generation in watershed development programme- A micro analysis In: Advances in Soil and Water Conservation in Indian Perspective, Soil Conservation Society of India and IGKV, Raipur (C.G.) (India). pp 256-263.
Mondal, B. 2011. Assessing the impact of watershed development programmes in Bundelkhand region of Madhya Pradesh: An institutional perspective. Ph.D Thesis, Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi.
Nalatwadmath, S.K., Rao, M.S.R. and Padmaiah, M. 1997. Joladarasi model watershed development programme in Bellary district of Karnataka: Adiagnostic evaluation. J. Rural Dev., 16(2): 313-328.
Pasha, S.M. 2000. Economic and ecological dimensions of livestock Economy Commonwealth Publishers, New Delhi.
Patil, S.L., Mondal, B. and Channa Basappa, K. 2012. Evaluation of watershed development projects under different institutional mechanisms in Bellary district of northern Karnataka, India. Ind. J. Soil Cons. 40(2): 173-178.
Reddy, V.R. 2000. Sustainable watershed management – institutional approach. Econ. Pol.Weekly 35(38): 3435-3444.
Shah, A. 2001. Who benefits from participatory watershed development? lessons from Gujarat, India. IIED Gatekeeper Series No. 97, International Institute for Environment and Development, London.
Sharda, V.N., Juyal, G.P. and Naik, B.S. 2008.Watershed development in India status and perspective Central Soil and Water Conservation Research and Training Institute, Dehradun
Sharma, B.R. and Scott, C.A. 2005. Watershed management challenges: Watershed Management Challenges: Improving Productivity, Resources and Livelihoods
Introduction and overview. In:. Eds: B.R. Sharma, J.S. Samra, C.A. Scott and S.P. Wani, International Water Management Institute (IWMI) and International Crop Research Institute for Semi-arid Tropics (ICRISAT), Malhotra Publishing House, New Delhi. pp. 245-257.
Singh, J. 2012. Trade-off of workers between MGNREGS and manufacturing. Office of the Economic Advisor, Department of Industrial Policy and Promotion, Ministry of Commerce & Industry, Udyog Bhawan, New Delhi.
Singh, D.V. 1994. Report on concurrent evaluation study of integrated watershed development (Hills) project: Markanda watershed, Himachal Pradesh Agro Economic Research Centre, Simla.
Verma, M. 2000. Economic valuation of forests of Himachal Pradesh. Indian Institute of Forest Management, Bhopal.
