Bio-engineering measures for soil and water conservation under new tea (Camellia sinensis L.) plantation inNilgiris
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.53550/Keywords:
Conservation measures, Contour staggered trenches, Double hedge, Vegetative barrierAbstract
An experiment was conducted during 2007-2009 in the farmer's field in the Nilgiris, the North-Western part of Tamil Nadu for evaluating different bioengineering measures in conserving runoff and soil loss under new tea plantation. One year old B-6 tea clones were planted at double hedge spacing (135 cm x 75 cm x 75 cm) in two slope ranges (8-12 and 30-35%). Four different types of conservation measures An experiment was conducted during 2007-2009 in the farmer's field in the Nilgiris, the North-Western part of Tamil Nadu for evaluating different bioengineering measures in conserving runoff and soil loss under new tea plantation. One year old B-6 tea clones were planted at double hedge spacing (135 cm x 75 cm x 75 cm) in two slope ranges (8-12 and 30-35%). Four different types of conservation measures viz., contour staggered trenches (CST) in the space between pairs of tea rows (walking rows), vegetative barrier (VB) of geranium in walking rows, CST and VB of geranium in alternate walking rows and CST with cover crop of beans were selected for evaluating runoff and soil loss with control. Minimum runoff of 112.2 mm in CST with cover crop of beans followed by CST (118 mm) was obtained in the slope range 8-12% with intermediate effect in the remaining treatments with similar trend in the slope of 30-35%. Minimum soil loss was found in the treatment under CST (4.9 t ha yr ) followed by CST with cover crop of beans (5.3 t ha yr ) in 8-12% slope. Similar trend with about 25% more annual soil loss in treatments under 30-35% slope was observed due to higher percent of runoff (23.7%). Variation in tea canopy due to treatment effect was observed in post monsoon period with maximum (34.5%) in CST with cover crop of beans and CST (35.6%) in 8-12% and 30-35% slope, respectively showing the effect ofCSTin canopy development.., contour staggered trenches (CST) in the space between pairs of tea rows (walking rows), vegetative barrier (VB) of geranium in walking rows, CST and VB of geranium in alternate walking rows and CST with cover crop of beans were selected for evaluating runoff and soil loss with control. Minimum runoff of 112.2 mm in CST with cover crop of beans followed by CST (118 mm) was obtained in the slope range 8-12% with intermediate effect in the remaining treatments with similar trend in the slope of 30-35%. Minimum soil loss was found in the treatment under CST (4.9 t ha yr ) followed by CST with cover crop of beans (5.3 t ha yr ) in 8-12% slope. Similar trend with about 25% more annual soil loss in treatments under 30-35% slope was observed due to higher percent of runoff (23.7%). Variation in tea canopy due to treatment effect was observed in post monsoon period with maximum (34.5%) in CST with cover crop of beans and CST (35.6%) in 8-12% and 30-35% slope, respectively showing the effect ofCSTin canopy development.
References
Ali, M.H. and Talukder, M.S.U. 2008. Increasing water productivity in corn production-Asynthes is. Agric. Water Manage, 95: 1201-1213.
Barua, D.N. 1989. Science and practices in tea culture. Tea Research Association, Calcutta- Jorhat, India, 493 p.
Chinnamani, S. 1977. Soil and water conservation in the hills of Western Ghats. Soil Cons. Digest, 5(1): 25-33.
Doorenbos, J. and Pruitt, W.O. 1977. Crop water requirement. Irrigation and Drainage Paper No.24 (revised). Rome, Italy: FAO.
Falkenmark, M. and Rockström, J. 2004. Balancing water for humans and nature: The new approach in ecohydrology. London, UK: Earthscan.
Krishnarajah, P. 1985. Soil erosion control measures for tea land in Sri Lanka. Sri Lanka J. Tea Sci., 54(2): 91-100.
Madhu, M. and Tripathi, K.P. 1997. Soil and water conservation practices in tea at Nilgiris: some facts. Indian Farm, 47(1): 33-36.
Madhu, M. and Sahoo, D.C. 2009. Rain water use efficiency of tea under different conservation measures in high hills of South India. In: 4 World congress on conservation agriculture, New Delhi. 211 p.
Manivannan, S. and Desai, A.R. 2007. Effect of in-situ moisture conservation practices on runoff, soil loss and initial growth of cashew (Anacardium occidentale). Ind. J. Soil Cons35(2): 147-150.
Othieno, C.O. 1992. Soils. In: Tea: Cultivation to consumption (eds. K.C. Wilson and M.N. Clifford). Chapman & Hall, London, pp. 137-172.
Rao, B.K., Kurothe, R.S., Pande, V.C. and Kumar, Gopal. 2012. Throughfall and stemflow measurement in bamboo (Dendrocalmus strictus) plantation. Ind. J. Soil Cons 40(1): 60-64.
Rao, B.K., Gaur M.L., Kumar, Gopal, Kurothe, R.S. and Tiwari, S.P. 2013. Morphological Characterization and Alterations in Cross Section of Different Order Streams of Mahi Ravines Ind. J. Soil.Cons., 41(1): 20-24.
Singh, A.K., Kala, S., Dubey, S.K., Rao, B.K., Gaur, M.L., Mohapatra, K.P. and Prasad, B. 2014. Evaluation of bamboo based conservation measures for rehabilitation of degradedYamuna ravines. Ind. J. Soil Cons., 42(1): 80-84.
Singh, R.K., Singh, B.P., Baboo, B. and Balram, S. 2012. Growth and biomass of ber (Ziziphus mauritiana) as influenced by various soil conservation techniques under rainfed condition. Ind. J. Soil Cons., 40(1) : 90-94.
Wasi Ullah, Gupta, S.K. and Dalal, S.S. 1972. Hydrological Measurements for watershed Research. Jugal Kishore and Co., Rajpur Road, Dehradun, India.
