Impact of in-situ moisture conservation measures on wood anatomical properties of Acacia auriculiformisin Western Ghats of Karnataka
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.53550/Keywords:
Acacia auriculiformis, Effect, Moisture conservation measures, Wood anatomical propertiesAbstract
The study was conducted to assess the effect of different moisture conservation measures viz. ring basin, half ring basin, pitting, trenching, trapezoidal basin, mulching on the wood properties of ten-year old Acacia auriculiformis. The values of fibre length (1265µm), fibre diameter (31.94 µm) and fibre lumen diameter (21.25 µm) were higher under ring basin when compared to that in control. Increase in cell size and related dimensions of fibres have a major influence on the quality of paper and pulp products as well as solid wood products. Vessel morphology such as vessel frequency and vessel diameter were lower in the trees treated with moisture conservation measures compared to the control, since vessel dimensions are known to affect paper sheet properties, those with lower values should be preferred. Tissue proportions viz., vessel percentage, parenchyma percentage and fibre percentage also showed significant differences with respect to different moisture conservation measures. The value of fibre percentage (15.87%) was maximum in ring basin and lowest (10%) for control. However, vessel percentage (3.57%) and parenchyma percentage (6.8%) were lower in ring basin. Since the ring basin conserves more water, cambial initials differentiate to become more fibreous than other tissue proportions. This suggested that ring basin is the best moisture conservation treatment in A. auriculiformis plantation to improve the strength of paper and pulpwood quality as well as timber quality.
References
Anonymous. 1971. ASTM standards: Part 16, Structural Sandwich construction: Wood and adhesive. American Society for Testing Materials, Philadelphia, 121p.
Anoop, E.V. 2004. Anatomical variation in juvenile wood of acacias grown in research trial in Kerala, India. J. Indian Acad. Wood Sci., 12: 129-136.
Blake, T.J. and Tschapinski, T.J. 1992. Water relations. In: Ecophysiology of short rotation forest crops. (C.P. Mitchell et al., eds.), Elsevier, London, 94 p.
Chandrashekaraiah, A.M. 1986. Investigation on Agroforestry systems in black soil of transitional tract of Karnataka. Ph. D. Thesis, University of Agricultural Sciencies, Dharwad, India, 200 p.
David, M.D. and Norman, W.P. 2006. Vessel frequency, size and arrangement in two eucalypt clones growing at sites differing in water availability. Nz. J. Forest., 4(2): 119-126.
Greaves, B.L., Borrahlo, N.M.G. and Raymond, C.A. 1997. Breeding objective for plantation eucalyptus grown for production of kraft pulp. For. Sci., 43: 465-472.
Jayaraman, K. and Rajan, A.R. 1991. Yield from Acacia auriculiformis Plantations in Kerala. KFRI Research Report No. 81. Kerala Forest Research Institute, Peechi, Thrissur.
Koppad, A.G. and Rao, R.V. 2004. Influence of in situ moisture conservation and methods and fertilizer on growth of teak (Tectona grandis). J. Trop. Forest. Sci., 17(4): 872-874.
Kramer,P.J. 1963. Water relations ofplants.New York. Agron. J.,55:31-35.
Okoh, E.T. 2014. Fibre, physical and mechanical properties of Ghanaian hardwoods. J. Ener. Nat. Res., 3(3): 25-30.
Okereke, O.O. 1962. Studies on the fibre dimensions of some Nigerian timbers and raw materials, Part 1. Res. Rep. No. 16. Fed., Ministry of Commerce and Industry, Lagos, Nigeria, 40 p.
Ona, T., Sonoda, T., Ito, K., Shibata, M., Tamai, Y., Kojima, Y., Ohshima, J., Yokota, S. and Yoshizawa, N. 2001. Investigation of relationship between cell and pulp properties in Eucalyptus by examination of within-tree property variations. Wood Sci. Technol., 35: 363-375.
Panshin, A.J. and de Zeeuw, C. 1980. Textbook of wood technology (4ed). NY: McGraw-Hill. 722 p.
Rydholm, S.A.1967. PulpingProcess. WileyandSons,New York, 1270p.
Sass, J.E. 1971. Botanical microtechnique. The Iowa State Univ. Press, Ames, Iowa, pp. 12-54.
Shallhorn, P.M. and Heinze, H.U. 1997. Hardwood vessel picking in the offset printing of uncoated fine papers. Pulp and Paper, 98: 21-24.
Wilson, K. and White, D.J.B. 1986. The Anatomy of Wood : its Diversity and Variability. Stobart and Sons, London, 309 p.
Wimmer, R.,Downes,G.M., Evans,R., Rasmussen, G. andFrench,J.2002. Direct effects of wood characteristics on pulp and paper hand sheet properties ofEucalyptus globulus. Holzforschung, 56:244-252.
Zobel, B.J. and van Buijtenen, J.P. 1989. Wood variation-its causes and control. Springer Series inWood Science, Berlin, Heidelberg, 229p.
