Livelihood and socio-economic development through watershed management - An impact assessment of Lachhaputraghati tribal catchment

Authors

  • Praveen Jakhar ICAR-Indian Institute of Soil and Water Conservation, Research Centre, Koraput, Odisha-763002 Author
  • M. Madhu ICAR-Indian Institute of Soil and Water Conservation, Research Centre, Koraput, Odisha-763002 Author
  • B.S. Naik ICAR-Indian Institute of Soil and Water Conservation, Research Centre, Koraput, Odisha-763002 Author
  • P. P. Adhikary ICAR-Indian Institute of Soil and Water Conservation, Research Centre, Koraput, Odisha-763002 Author
  • H.C. Hombe Gowda ICAR-Indian Institute of Soil and Water Conservation, Research Centre, Koraput, Odisha-763002 Author
  • D. Barman ICAR-Central Research Institute for Jute and Allied Fibres, Barrackpore -743101, West Bengal. Author
  • G.B. Naik ICAR-Indian Institute of Soil and Water Conservation, Research Centre, Koraput, Odisha-763002 Author
  • K.P. Gore ICAR-Indian Institute of Soil and Water Conservation, Research Centre, Koraput, Odisha-763002 Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.53550/

Keywords:

Impact assessment, Participation Index, Watershed productivity

Abstract

Livelihood and socio-economic development are the most important indices of  development of tribal agrarian community particularly those of rainfed areas. A model watershed in the tribal dominated areas of southern Odisha was developed  using diverse treatments implemented by ICAR-IISWC, Research Centre,  Koraput. A comprehensive assessment of watershed was taken up to gauge socio economic impacts of various technological interventions. The overall watershed  -1 -1 productivity increased from 4962 kg ha (pre-project) to 6126 kg ha (19%) post project period. The average human population carrying capacity of crops  increased from 4.0 to 4.4 with an increase of 9.3%. The overall People  Participation Index was found to be 56% indicating that the stakeholders' overall  participation was above the medium level. Income and expenditure analysis  revealed that due to project implementation, large farmers showed interest in  initiating large scale enterprises i.e., poultry and livestock. Among medium and  small farmers, agricultural activities registered an increase of 15% which shows  their diversification from labour work and their engagement in their own  activities. A significant decrease of 5% in fuelwood sales shows the changing  attitude as well as dependency on forests. Among economic parameters, BC ratio  at10%discountratewasfoundtobe1.16with an internal Rate of Return of 19.5%.

References

Ahluwalia, M.S. 2005. Reducing poverty and hunger in India: The role of Agriculture. Annual Report Essay. IFPRI 2004-2005. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.2499/0896297519.E02

Alipour, A., Veisi, H., Darijani F., Mirbagheri B. and Behbahani, A.G. 2012. Study and determination of energy consumption to produce conventional rice of the Guilan province. Res. Agr. Engg.,58(3):99-106.

Chambers, R. and Conway, G. 1992, Sustainable rural livelihoods: practical concepts for the 21st century. IDS Discussion Paper No. 296. Brighton, IDS,pp. 7-8.

Chauhan, K.P.S. 1998. Framework for conservation and sustainable use of biological diversity. Action plan for the Eastern Ghats Region., Proc. National seminar on Conservation of Eastern Ghats, Andhra University, Vishakhapatnam.

Dhyani, B.L., Samra, J.S., Ram Babu and Kumar, N. 2001. Environmental payoff integrated watershed management programme in Garhwal Himalaya- A case study of ORP Fakot. J. Soil Water Cons., 45(3&4): 141-147.

Jakhar, P., Naik, B.S., Hombe Gowda, H.C., Barman, D., Naik, G.B. and Gore, K.P. 2010. Participatory Rural Appraisal for Integrated Planning and Sustainable Watershed Development- A case study of Lachhaputraghatiwatershed. Ind. J. SoilCons.,38(3):223-228.

Joshi, P.K.,Jha, A.K., Wani, S.P.,Joshi, Laxmi and Shiyani, R.L. 2005. Meta analysis to assess impact of watershed program and people's participation. Research Report 8, Comprehensive Assessment of watershed management in agriculture, International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics andAsianDevelopmentBank, 21p.

Joshi, P.K., Pangare, V.S.B., Wani, S.P., Bouma, J. and Scott, C. 2004. Socio economic and policy research on watershed management in India: Synthesis of past experiences and needs for future research. Global Theme on Agro-ecosystems Report no. 7. Patancheru 502 324, Andhra Pradesh, India: International Crops Research Institute for the Semi AridTropics.88p.

Kerr, J., Pangare, G., Pangare, L.V. and George, P.J. 2000. An evaluation of dryland watershed development projects in India. EPTD Discussion Paper 68. Environment and Policy Production Technology Division, International Food Policy Research Institute, Washington D.C, USA.

NIN. 2009. Nutrient Requirements and Recommended Dietary Allowances for Indians. A Report of the Expert Group of the Indian Council of Medical Research, National Institute of Nutrition, Indian Council of Medical Research, Hyderabad 500604. 334 p.

NRAA. 2008. Common Guidelines for Watershed Development Projects 2008. National Rainfed Area Authority, Planning Commission, Government of India, New Delhi- 110012. 59 p.

NRAA. 2012. Prioritization ofRainfed Areas in India. National Rainfed Area Authority, Government of India, New Delhi, Studyreport4. 100p.

Rockstrom, J., Nuhu Hatibu, Theib, Y., Oweis and Wani, S.P. 2007. Managing water in rainfed agriculture. Water for Food, Water for Life: A Comprehensive Assessment of Water Management in Agriculture (ed. David Molden). London, UK: Earthscan and Colombo, Sri-Lanka: International Water Management Institute, pp. 315-348.

Sharda, V.N., Samra, J.S. and Dogra, P. 2005. Participatory watershed management for sustainable development: Experience from IWDP. Ind. J. SoilCons.,33(2):93-103.

Sikka, A.K., Madhu, M., Subhash Chand, Selvi., V., Singh, D.V., Sundarambal, P. and Jeevarathanam, K. 2004. Participatory Watershed Management for Sustainable Development in Salaiyur watershed, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, CSWCRTI, Research Centre, Udhagamandalam, 96 p.

Singh, K. 1992. Agricultural Policy in India: Need for a Fresh Look, Indian Economic Panorama, 2(2): 33-41.

Tuti, M.D., Ved Prakash, Pandey, B.M., Bhattacharyya, R., Mahanta, D. Bisht, J.K., Kumar,M., Mina, B.L., Kumar, N., Bhatt, .J.C. and Srivastva. A.K. 2012. Energy budgeting of colocasia-based cropping systems in the Indian sub-Himalayas. Energy, 45: 986-993.

Downloads

Published

2026-01-13

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Livelihood and socio-economic development through watershed management - An impact assessment of Lachhaputraghati tribal catchment . (2026). Indian Journal of Soil Conservation, 43(3), 213-217. https://doi.org/10.53550/

Similar Articles

101-110 of 304

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >>