Performance of mango cultivars in eroded soils of Shiwalik foothills

Authors

  • Ram Prasad ICAR-Indian Institute of Soil and Water Conservation, Research Centre, Madhya Marg, Chandigarh-160019 Author
  • S.K. Yadav ICAR-Indian Institute of Soil and Water Conservation, Research Centre, Gwalior Road, Datia-475661 Madhya Pradesh Author
  • Pramod Kumar Dr. Y.S. Parmar University of Horticulture and Forestry-RHRTS, Dhaulakuan, District Sirmour, Himachal Pradesh-173031 Author
  • R.P. Yadav ICAR-National Bureau of Soil Survey and Land Use Planning, Regional Centre, IARI, New Delhi-110012. Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.53550/

Keywords:

Shiwalik foothills, Fruit quality evaluation, Yield efficiency

Abstract

The present study describes the evaluation of six commercially important mango (Mangifera indica L.) cultivars namely 'Dashehari', 'Langra', 'Chausa', 'Lucknow Safeda', 'Ramkela', 'Sinduri' and two hybrids, namely 'Amrapali' (Dashehari × Neelam) and 'Mallika' (Neelam × Dashehari) being grown in the eroded soils of lower Himalayas. The experimental orchard was established in the year 2000 with plantation of uniform sized plantlets of different cultivars/hybrids under uniform edaphic conditions. The climate is sub-tropical humid with an annual average rainfall of 1118.8 mm. Comprehensive data for evaluation of horticultural traits of different cultivars and hybrids were recorded for three consecutive years (2008-2010). Maximum TCSA (477.2 cm ), TCV (116.97 m ) and CA (23.50 m ) was observed in cultivar 'Ramkela'. Cultivar 'Sinduri' exhibited low growth vigour and the poorest total yields. Cumulative yield ranged from 28.7 kg tree (for the lowest yield cultivar 'Sinduri') to 91.1 kg tree (for the most productive hybrid 'Mallika'). The qualitative analysis indicated the superiority of hybrid 'Mallika' in terms of total soluble solids, titrable acidity, TSS: acid ratio, sugar content, low stone and peel content and high pulp attributes and low percent of physiological loss in weight of fruit compared to other cultivars and hybrids.

References

A.O.A.C. 1980. Official Methods of Analysis of the Analytical Chemists. Association of Official Analytical Chemistry, 83: Washington D.C.617-623.

Barritt, B.H., Konishi, B.S. and Dilley, M.A. 1997. Tree size. Yield and biennial bearing relationships with 40 apple rootstocks and tree scion cultivars. Acta Hortic., 451: 105-112.

Bihari, M., Kumar, R., Singh, K., Kumar, A., Prasad, A., Narayan, S. and Pandey, S.K.N. 2012. Quality parameters studies on Mangifera Genus and varieties. Ind. J. Hort 69(2): 272-276.

Chadha, K.L., Singh, S.K., Asrey, R., Patel, V.B. and Sethi, S. 2004.Maturity standards in fruits and vegetables. pp. 795-796. In: Postharvest management marketing and trade in horticultural crops-Vol- (Eds. K.L. Chadha, R.N. Pal, S.K. Singh and K.V. Prasad). Proc. First Indian Horticultural Congress, 6-9 Nov., 2004, The Horticultural Society of India, NewDelhi.

Government of India. 2009. State of Environment Report-2009. In: Ministry of Environment and Forest. http://www.moef.gov.in, http://envfor.nic.in

Jackson, E.J. 1997. Light interception and canopy characteristics at low latitudes in relation to orchard system design. Acta Hortic 451: 417-425.

Jackson, D.I. 2011. Climate in Fruit Plants. pp. 11-17. In: Temperate and subtropical fruit production-3 Edition (Eds. D.I. Jackson, N.E. Looney, Michael Morley-Bunker and Graham Thiele) CABI International.

James, P.A. and Middlenton, S.G. 2001. Apple cultivar and rootstock performance at lenswood, South Australia. Acta Hortic 557: 69-76.

Jones, J.W., Hoogenboom, G., Porter, C.H., Boote, K.J., Batchelor, W.D., Hunt, L.A.,Wilkens, P.W., Singh, U., Gijsman, A.J. and Ritchie, J.T. 2003. DSSAT Cropping System Model. 18: European J. Agro.,235 265.

Majumdar, P.K. and Sharma, D.K. 1985. Mango. pp. 69-123. In: Fruits of India Tropical and Subtropical. (Ed. T.K. Bose), Naya Prokash, Calcutta-6, India

McAfee, J.D. and Rom, C.R. 2003. Evaluation of size-controlling apple rootstocks for high-density 'Gala' apple orchards in Arkansas: final year results of the 1994 NC-140 Uniform Apple Rootstock Trail. Hortic. Stud. : 21-23.

Panse, V.G. and Sukhatme, P.V. 1985 Statistical Methods for Agricultural Workers, 4th ed Indian Council of Agricultural Research, New Delhi, India.

Prasad, R.,Yadav, R.P., Aggarwal, R.K., Agnihotri,Y., Mittal, S.P., Tiwari, A.K. and Samra, J.S. 2007. Prospects of aonla cultivation on degraded shivalik lands

Tech. Bulletin no. T-55/C-13. Central Soil and Water Conservation Research and Training Institute, Research Centre, Chandigarh (U.T.). 133 p.

Ranganna, S. 1986. Handbook of analysis and quality control for fruits and vegetable products, second edition . Tata McGraw-Hill Publishing Company Limited,NewDelhi, India. 1112 p.

Reddy, Y.T.N., Kurian, R.M., Ramachander, P.R., Gorakh, S. and Kohli, R.R. 2003. Long-term effects of rootstocks on growth and fruit yielding patterns of 'Alphonso' mango (Mangifera indica L.) Scientia Hortic., 97: 95-108

Smith, M.W., Bright, J.D., Hoult, M.D., Renfree, R.A. and Maddern, T. 2008. Field Evaluation of 64 rootstocks for growth and yield of 'Kensington Pride' mango. Hort. Sci 43 (6): 1720-1725

Westwood, Melvin, N. 1988. Temperate Zone Pomology. Timber Press, 9999 S.W.Wilshire, Portland, Oregon. 428 p.

Yang, D., Kanae, S., Oki, T., Koike, T. and Musiake, K. 2003. Global potential soil erosion with reference to land use and climate changes. Hydrol. Process 17: 2913-2928

Downloads

Published

2026-01-12

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Performance of mango cultivars in eroded soils of Shiwalik foothills. (2026). Indian Journal of Soil Conservation, 44(1), 67-72. https://doi.org/10.53550/

Similar Articles

11-20 of 244

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.