Influence of conservation practices on soil moisture and growth performance of new tea [Camellia sinensis (L.)] plantation in Nilgiris

Authors

  • D.C. Sahoo ICAR-Indian Institute of Soil and Water Conservation, Research Centre, Koraput-763002, Odisha Author
  • M. Madhu ICAR-Indian Institute of Soil and Water Conservation, Research Centre, Koraput-763002, Odisha Author
  • S. Santhana Bosu Agricultural Engineering College and Research Institute, TNAU, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu Author
  • O.P.S. Khola ICAR-Indian Institute of Soil and Water Conservation, Research Centre, Udhagamandalam-643004, Tamil Nadu. Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.53550/

Keywords:

Conservation practices, Contour staggered trenches, Cover crop, Double hedge, Vegetative barrier

Abstract

An experiment under rainfed condition was conducted in the farmer's field in the Nilgiris, the North-Western part of Tamil Nadu for evaluating the influence of conservation practices on soil moisture and plant growth under new tea plantation. One year old B-6 tea clones were planted at double hedge spacing (135 x 75 x 75 cm) in two slopes (8-12 and 30-35%) with treatments viz., contour staggered trenches (CST) in the walking rows (space between pairs of tea rows), vegetative barrier (VB) of geranium in walking rows, CST and VB of geranium in alternate walking rows, CST with cover crop of beans as well as in control condition. Minimum runoff in CST with cover crop followed by CST and CST with VB in both the slopes proved the cause of CST either alone or in combination in reducing runoff. Runoff retention in the trenches attributed to higher soil moisture in CST (25.6%) and CST with cover crop (24.8% ) followed by CST with VB (22.8%) in 8-12% slope with similar trend as well in 30-35% slope during non-monsoon period. Tea canopy followed a similar trend to that of soil moisture content with maximum (39.5%) in the CST with cover crop followed by CST (38.4%) and minimum in control just before the first harvest in 8-12% slope. The maximum plant height obtained in CST with cover crop followed by CST may be due to similar reason as in canopy development. Higher yield from all the conservation practices over control (3.8 t ha-1) with maximum in CST with cover crop (4.7 t ha-1) followed by CST (4.4 t ha-1) in 8-12% slope was due to better growth resulting from higher soil moisture.

References

Badhe, V.T. and Magar, S.S. 2004. Influence of different conservation measures on runoff, soil and nutrient loss under Cashew nut in lateritic soils of south Konkan region. Ind. J. Soil Cons., 32(2): 143- 147.

Chinnamani, S. 1977. Soil and water conservation in the hills of Western Ghats. Soil Cons. Digest, 5(1): 25-33.

Jayant Kumar, Rhalia, A.S., Rana, S.S. and Verma, H.S. 1999. Long term effects of orchard management practices on growth, yield and fruit quality of apple (Malus domestica.). Indian J. Agric. Sci., 69(5): 355- 358.

Kruger, H.J., Fantaw, B., Michael, Y.G. and Kajela, K. 1996. Creating an inventory of indigenous SWC measures in Ethiopia. In: Reij C., Scoones I. and Toulmin C. (Eds), Sustaining the soil: Indigenous soil and water conservation in Africa. Earthscan Ltd, London, 260 p.

Kumar, M., Singh, R.A. and Singh, S.P. 2008. Performance of moisture conservation practices and level of nitrogen on sorghum under rainfed ecosystem of central Uttar Pradesh. Ind. J. Soil Cons., 36(1): 22-23.

Madhu, M. and Tripathi, K.P. 1997. Soil and water conservation practices in tea at Nilgiris: some facts. Indian Farm., 47(1): 33-36.

Madhu, M. and Sahoo, D.C. 2009. Rain water use efficiency of tea under th different conservation measures in high hills of South India. In: 4 World congress on conservation agriculture, New Delhi: 211 p.

Madhu, M., Sahoo, D.C., Sharda, V.N. and Sikka, A.K. 2010. Rainwater use efficiency of tea (Camellia sinensis (L.)) under different conservation measures in high hills of South India. Applied Geography, 31: 450-455.

Mane,M.S.,Mahadkar,U.V.,Ayare,B.L. andThorat,T.N. 2009. Performance of mechanical soil conservation measures in cashew plantation grown on steep slopes of Konkan. Ind. J. Soil Cons., 37(3): 181-184.

Regar, P.L., Rao, S.S. and Joshi, N.L. 2009. Effect of in-situ moisture conservation practices on productivity of rainfed taramira in arid Rajasthan. Ind. J. Soil Cons., 37(3): 197-200.

Singh, R.K., Prasad, S.N., Ali, S., Kumar, A., Singh, K.D., Prasad, A., Singh, S.V. and Parandiyal, A.K. 2005. On-farm evaluation of conservation measures to performance of rainfed crops in semi-arid region. Ind. J. Soil Cons., 33(2): 141-143.

Singh, R.K., Singh, B.P., Baboo, B. and Balram, S. 2012. Growth and biomass of ber (Ziziphus mauritiana) as influenced by various soil conservation techniques under rainfed condition. Ind. J. Soil Cons., 40(1): 90-94.

Shukla, A.K., Pathak, R.K., Tiwari, R.P. and Vishal Nath. 2000. Influence of irrigation and mulching on plant growth and leaf nutrient status of aonla under sodic soil. J. Applied Hort., 2(1): 37-38.

Downloads

Published

2026-01-01

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Influence of conservation practices on soil moisture and growth performance of new tea [Camellia sinensis (L.)] plantation in Nilgiris. (2026). Indian Journal of Soil Conservation, 44(3), 297-301. https://doi.org/10.53550/

Similar Articles

11-20 of 354

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >>